[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240312120930.5yp5vx7cbdkpc6id@dhruva>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:39:30 +0530
From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
To: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
CC: <sudeep.holla@....com>, <cristian.marussi@....com>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <lukasz.luba@....com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] cpufreq: scmi: Enable boost support
On Mar 12, 2024 at 15:17:26 +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Certain platforms host a number of higher OPPs that are exclusive to
> CPUs within specific CPUfreq policies and not all CPUs within that
> CPUfreq policy are able to achieve those higher OPPs due to power
> constraints. These OPPs are marked as turbo in the freq_table and in
> the presence of such OPPs, let's enable boost by default.
Thanks, I like this commit message better than the prev rev.
>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
> ---
>
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
--
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists