[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18d34385-fd0b-401c-9ca4-ccf22106bd68@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:10:02 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>, andersson@...nel.org,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
michal.simek@....com, ben.levinsky@....com
Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled
Memory (TCM) bindings
On 11/03/2024 17:27, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>>> + then:
>>> + patternProperties:
>>> + "^r5f@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>> + type: object
>>> +
>>> + properties:
>>> + reg:
>>> + minItems: 1
>>> + items:
>>> + - description: ATCM internal memory
>>> + - description: BTCM internal memory
>>> + - description: extra ATCM memory in lockstep mode
>>> + - description: extra BTCM memory in lockstep mode
>>> +
>>> + reg-names:
>>> + minItems: 1
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: atcm0
>>> + - const: btcm0
>>> + - const: atcm1
>>> + - const: btcm1
>>
>> Why power domains are flexible?
>
> User may not want to use all the TCMs. For example, if users want to turn-on only TCM-A and rest of them want to keep off, then
>
> they can avoid having power-domains of other TCMs in the device-tree. This helps with less power-consumption when needed.
>
> Hence flexible list of power-domains list.
>
Isn't turning on/off driver's job? Sorry, but what is "user" here? DTS
describes bindings, not OS policy.
Also, please wrap your replies to match email style.
> I can certainly mention "items:" under power-domains property.
>
>
>>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists