[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfBI1l2l3TWw0tMV@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 05:21:42 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, brauner@...nel.org, david@...morbit.com,
tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
chengzhihao1@...wei.com, yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: convert delayed extents to unwritten when
zeroing post eof blocks
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 08:37:37AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > +convert_delay:
> > + end_fsb = min(end_fsb, imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount);
> > + xfs_iunlock(ip, lockmode);
> > + truncate_pagecache_range(inode, offset, XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, end_fsb));
> > + error = xfs_iomap_write_direct(ip, offset_fsb, end_fsb - offset_fsb,
> > + flags, &imap, &seq);
>
> I expected this to be a direct call to xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc.
> What was the reason not for using that?
Same here. The fact that we even convert delalloc reservations in
xfs_iomap_write_direct is something that doesn't make much sense
given that we're punching out delalloc reservations before starting
direct I/O.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists