linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] statx: stx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:27:33 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>, 
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, 
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] statx: stx_subvol

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 04:15:04PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 02:43:11PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 08:12:33AM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > > On 08.03.24 03:29, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > > Add a new statx field for (sub)volume identifiers, as implemented by
> > > > btrfs and bcachefs.
> > > > 
> > > > This includes bcachefs support; we'll definitely want btrfs support as
> > > > well.
> > > 
> > > For btrfs you can add the following:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  From 82343b7cb2a947bca43234c443b9c22339367f68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
> > > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:09:36 +0100
> > > Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: provide subvolume id for statx
> > > 
> > > Add the inode's subvolume id to the newly proposed statx subvol field.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Thanks, will fold, once I hear from Josef.
> 
> Can we try to make 6.9? Need to know what to put in the manpage, and
> I've got userspace tooling that wants to use it.

Hm, I understand that you want to see this done but I think it's just
too tight. If this would've been Acked last week then we could've done
it the second week of the merge window. So my reaction is to wait for
v6.10. What do others think?