[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e83b606a-e34e-423f-b26b-df745052d06b@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:44:19 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"Gabriel L. Somlo" <gsomlo@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] of: Create of_root if no dtb provided by firmware
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 03:41:32PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 3:06 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:
> static int __init regulator_init_complete(void)
> {
> /*
> * Since DT doesn't provide an idiomatic mechanism for
> * enabling full constraints and since it's much more natural
> * with DT to provide them just assume that a DT enabled
> * system has full constraints.
> */
> if (of_have_populated_dt())
> has_full_constraints = true;
>
> ...
> }
> late_initcall_sync(regulator_init_complete);
> (The latter looks a bit futile, as have_full_constraints() already
> contains a check for of_have_populated_dt()?)
Yes, it's duplicated and we should remove it.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists