linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e69948c4-756b-4bc6-b543-eeb0028da83f@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:33:06 -0500
From: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 michal.simek@....com, ben.levinsky@....com
Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled
 Memory (TCM) bindings


On 3/12/24 7:10 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/03/2024 19:39, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> >>> +
> >>> +    else:
> >>> +      patternProperties:
> >>> +        "^r5f@[0-9a-f]+$":
> >>> +          type: object
> >>> +
> >>> +          properties:
> >>> +            reg:
> >>> +              minItems: 1
> >>> +              items:
> >>> +                - description: ATCM internal memory
> >>> +                - description: BTCM internal memory
> >>> +
> >>> +            reg-names:
> >>> +              minItems: 1
> >>> +              items:
> >>> +                - const: atcm0
> >>> +                - const: btcm0
> >>> +
> >>> +            power-domains:
> >>> +              maxItems: 3
> >>
> >> Please list power domains.
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Sent v13 addressing both comments.
> > 
>
> And gave me exactly two hours to disagree?

I am sorry, I thought I was addressing the right comments.

It was minor change tempted me to push new revision, will wait longer next time.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>