[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240312162125.136813-1-dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:21:25 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [GIT PULL] x86/apic for 6.9-rc1 (includes a new revert)
Hi Linus,
Please pull an x86/apic revert. The reverted commit is not x86/apic
material and was cruft left over from a merge.
I believe the sequence of events went something like this:
* The commit in question was added to x86/urgent
* x86/urgent was merged into x86/apic to resolve a conflict
* The commit was zapped from x86/urgent, but *not* from x86/apic
* x86/apic got pullled (yesterday)
I think we need to be a bit more vigilant when zapping things to
make sure none of the other branches are depending on the zapped
material.
--
The following changes since commit f0551af021308a2a1163dc63d1f1bba3594208bd:
x86/topology: Ignore non-present APIC IDs in a present package (2024-03-06 14:35:30 +0100)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git tags/x86-apic-2024-03-12
for you to fetch changes up to 532a0c57d7ff75e8f07d4e25cba4184989e2a241:
Revert "x86/bugs: Use fixed addressing for VERW operand" (2024-03-12 08:33:51 -0700)
----------------------------------------------------------------
* Revert VERW fixed addressing patch
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Hansen (1):
Revert "x86/bugs: Use fixed addressing for VERW operand"
arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists