lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:39:22 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski
 <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/bitmap: Fix bitmap_scatter() and bitmap_gather()
 kernel doc

On 3/12/24 09:35, Herve Codina wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> 
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:43:00 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 05:42:11PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 09:54:03AM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
>>>> The make htmldoc command failed with the following error
>>>>    ... include/linux/bitmap.h:524: ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
>>>>    ... include/linux/bitmap.h:524: CRITICAL: Unexpected section title or transition.
>>>>
>>>> Move the visual representation to a literal block.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> This patch fixes de5f84338970 ("lib/bitmap: Introduce bitmap_scatter() and bitmap_gather() helpers")
>>>> available in net-next and linux-next
>>>
>>> Not sure about rules of net-next, but I would add Fixes FWIW:
>>>
>>> Fixes: de5f84338970 ("lib/bitmap: Introduce bitmap_scatter() and bitmap_gather() helpers")
> 
> I think I cannot add the Fixes tag as the de5f84338970 commit is not yet
> merged in Torvald's tree and I am not sure that the commit hash will not
> change during the merge process.

That is not a reason for not providing a Fixes tag, it does not have to 
be in Linus' tree.

As a matter of fact, let us consider someone doing a back port of your 
patches into their custom local tree, they would like to have that 
information that this patch fixes a problem introduced by an earlier 
commit so they can take the entire set of commits as a whole.
-- 
Florian


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ