lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list] 
Message-Id: <20240312170309.2546362-4-linux@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:02:58 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Daniel Diaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
	David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
	Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@...eup.net>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
	netdev@...ts.linux.dev,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: [PATCH 03/14] kunit: Add test cases for backtrace warning suppression

Add unit tests to verify that warning backtrace suppression works.

If backtrace suppression does _not_ work, the unit tests will likely
trigger unsuppressed backtraces, which should actually help to get
the affected architectures / platforms fixed.

Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
---
 lib/kunit/Makefile                     |   3 +-
 lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c

diff --git a/lib/kunit/Makefile b/lib/kunit/Makefile
index 545b57c3be48..6a44d2b54ea9 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/Makefile
+++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ endif
 obj-y +=				hooks.o \
 					bug.o
 
-obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +=		kunit-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +=		kunit-test.o \
+					backtrace-suppression-test.o
 
 # string-stream-test compiles built-in only.
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST),y)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c b/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..47c619283802
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test for suppressing warning tracebacks
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024, Guenter Roeck
+ * Author: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct);
+
+	START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct);
+	WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed");
+	END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct), 1);
+}
+
+static void trigger_backtrace_warn(void)
+{
+	WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed");
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_indirect(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+
+	START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+	trigger_backtrace_warn();
+	END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(trigger_backtrace_warn), 1);
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+	DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi);
+
+	START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi);
+	START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+	WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed");
+	trigger_backtrace_warn();
+	END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+	END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi), 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(trigger_backtrace_warn), 1);
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct);
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KALLSYMS))
+		kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE or CONFIG_KALLSYMS");
+
+	START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct);
+	WARN_ON(1);
+	END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+			SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct), 1);
+}
+
+static void trigger_backtrace_warn_on(void)
+{
+	WARN_ON(1);
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_indirect(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn_on);
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE))
+		kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE");
+
+	START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn_on);
+	trigger_backtrace_warn_on();
+	END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn_on);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(trigger_backtrace_warn_on), 1);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case backtrace_suppression_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct),
+	KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_indirect),
+	KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi),
+	KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct),
+	KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_indirect),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite backtrace_suppression_test_suite = {
+	.name = "backtrace-suppression-test",
+	.test_cases = backtrace_suppression_test_cases,
+};
+kunit_test_suites(&backtrace_suppression_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-- 
2.39.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ