linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] x86/resctrl : Support AMD Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <efc9155b-64b7-4661-9cc7-95059212e178@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:24:57 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
 James Morse <james.morse@....com>, corbet@....net, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
 tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, paulmck@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
 tj@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, yanjiewtw@...il.com,
 kim.phillips@....com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
 jmattson@...gle.com, leitao@...ian.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
 rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
 jithu.joseph@...el.com, kai.huang@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
 daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, sandipan.das@....com,
 ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, peternewman@...gle.com,
 maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] x86/resctrl : Support AMD Assignable Bandwidth
 Monitoring Counters (ABMC)

Hi Reinette,

On 3/12/24 12:15, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
> 
> On 3/12/2024 10:07 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>> On 3/12/24 10:13, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>> On 3/11/2024 8:40 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>>>> On 2/27/24 17:50, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>>>> On 2/27/2024 10:12 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/26/24 15:20, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/26/2024 9:59 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/23/24 16:21, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apart from the "default behavior" there are two options to consider ...
>>>>>>>>> (a) the "original" behavior(? I do not know what to call it) - this would be
>>>>>>>>>     where user space wants(?) to have the current non-ABMC behavior on an ABMC
>>>>>>>>>     system, where the previous "num_rmids" monitor groups can be created but
>>>>>>>>>     the counters are reset unpredictably ... should this still be supported
>>>>>>>>>     on ABMC systems though?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would say yes. For some reason user(hardware or software issues) is not
>>>>>>>> able to use ABMC mode, they have an option to go back to legacy mode.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see. Should this perhaps be protected behind the resctrl "debug" mount option?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The debug option gives wrong impression. It is better to keep the option
>>>>>> open to enable the feature in normal mode.
>>>>>
>>>>> You mentioned that it would only be needed when there are hardware or
>>>>> software issues ... so debug does sound appropriate. Could you please give
>>>>> an example of how debug option gives wrong impression? Why would you want
>>>>> users to keep using "legacy" mode on an ABMC system?
>>>>
>>>> We may not be able to use "-o debug" option to enable "legacy_mbm".
>>>> With debug option it will always go to legcay mbm even if ABMC is supported.
>>>>
>>>> For example when ABMC is supported, I cannot mount the resctrl with debug
>>>> option to test ABMC.
>>>>
>>>> I need to have a way to mount resctrl with ABMC and debug option. I can
>>>> add "-o legacy_mbm" to enable lecacy_mbm.
>>>
>>> I do not think it is necessary to add a unique debug option for this.
>>
>> It makes the code simple.
>>
>>> What if instead the "-o debug" mount option exposes the "original/legacy"
>>
>> Can you please elaborate on this?
>>
>> Did you mean following command to enable legacy mode?
>>
>> $echo "original/legacy"    /sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/mbm_assign_control
>>
>> It feels like a overkill and confusing.
> 
> I used the "original/legacy" text to make it clear which behavior I was
> referring to. It was not a proposal for a label used by user space to 
> select the behavior.
> 
> Isn't /sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/mbm_assign_control the file that will
> assign the counters to domains? That should not be the file used to 

ok.

> select the behavior. You had /sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/mbm_assign
> with which user space selects behavior, no?

Yes. I think we can use this file(/sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/mbm_assign).
Thanks
Babu Moger