linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: add support for A4 based Amlogic BA400

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:29:58 +0100
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, 
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: add support for A4 based Amlogic BA400

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 10:19 AM Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
<devnull+xianwei.zhao.amlogic.com@...nel.org> wrote:
[...]
> +               apb@...00000 {
Node names need to be generic - since this is a bug it needs to be:
  bus@...00000 {
Or if you want to make it clear how this bus is called then you can use:
  apb: bus@...00000 {

The same comment applies to the amlogic-a5.dtsi patch (4/4).
And while here, I fully agree with Jerome: having a bit more details
would be great so we can judge on whether a common .dtsi makes sense.
For this it would be helpful to know how many IP blocks those two SoCs
have in common and how many are different.


Best regards,
Martin