linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:55:49 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, Matteo.Carlini@....com,
	Valentin.Schneider@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	anshuman.khandual@....com, Eric Mackay <eric.mackay@...cle.com>,
	dave.kleikamp@...cle.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux@...linux.org.uk, robin.murphy@....com,
	vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com, yang@...amperecomputing.com,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase
 supported CPUs to 512

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 10:06:06AM -0700, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> 
> > This could be an issue in the ARM64 arch code itself where there maybe
> > an assumption elsewhere that a cpumask can always store up to NR_CPU
> > cpus and not only nr_cpu_ids as OFFSTACK does.
> > 
> > How can I exercise the opp driver in order to recreate the problem?
> > 
> > I assume the opp driver is ARM specific? x86 defaults to OFFSTACK so if
> > there is an issue with OFFSTACK in opp then it should fail with kernel
> > default configuration on that platform.
> 
> I checked the ARM64 arch sources use of NR_CPUS and its all fine.
> 
> Also verified in my testing logs that CONFIG_PM_OPP was set in all tests.
> 
> No warnings in the kernel log during those tests.
> 
> How to reproduce this?

I guess you need a platform with a dts that has an "operating-points-v2"
property. I don't have any around.

Sudeep was trying to trigger this code path earlier, not sure where he
got to.

-- 
Catalin