linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10/5.15] io_uring: fix registered files leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a8c81d35-e6ac-420c-9ffa-24dd9e009e29-pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:38:02 +0300
From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>, 
	lvc-project@...uxtesting.org, Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>, 
	Roman Belyaev <belyaevrd@...dex.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10/5.15] io_uring: fix registered files leak

On 24/03/12 11:54AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/12/24 9:21 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 3/12/24 9:14 AM, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> >> On 24/03/12 08:34AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> On 3/12/24 8:23 AM, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>>> I feel io_uring-SCM related code should be dropped entirely from the
> >>>> stable branches as the backports already differ greatly between versions
> >>>> and some parts are still kept, some have been dropped in a non-consistent
> >>>> order. Though this might contradict with stable kernel rules or be
> >>>> inappropriate for some other reason.
> >>>
> >>> Looks fine to me, and I agree, it makes much more sense to drop it all
> >>> from 5.10/5.15-stable as well to keep them in sync with upstream. And I
> >>> think this is fine for stable, dropping code is always a good thing.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Alright, got it. So that would require dropping it from all of the
> >> supported 5.4, 6.1, 6.6, 6.7, too.
> >>
> >> Would it be okay if I'll send this as a series?
> > 
> > Yeah I think so, keeping the code more in sync is always a good thing
> > when it comes to stable. Just make sure you mark the backport commits
> > with the appropriate upstream shas. Thanks!
> 
> I'll just do these backports myself, thanks for bringing it up.

Great, thanks!

--
Fedor