[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpFDY=+gmVytYY6iCYds5OW0gVfwrXguWWq0B0G1qq7hYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:41:28 -0700
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, mhocko@...e.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, mgorman@...e.de,
dave@...olabs.net, willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com,
penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, corbet@....net, void@...ifault.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com,
david@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, masahiroy@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org,
dennis@...nel.org, jhubbard@...dia.com, tj@...nel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
rppt@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, pasha.tatashin@...een.com,
yosryahmed@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
hughd@...gle.com, andreyknvl@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, vvvvvv@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
ebiggers@...gle.com, ytcoode@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com, glider@...gle.com,
elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com, jbaron@...mai.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/37] lib: prevent module unloading if memory is not freed
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:22 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 10:24:10AM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > Skip freeing module's data section if there are non-zero allocation tags
> > because otherwise, once these allocations are freed, the access to their
> > code tag would cause UAF.
>
> So you just let them linger?
Well, I think this is not a normal situation when a module allocated
some memory and then is being unloaded without freeing that memory,
no?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
>
>
> > /* Free a module, remove from lists, etc. */
> > static void free_module(struct module *mod)
> > {
> > + bool unload_codetags;
> > +
> > trace_module_free(mod);
> >
> > - codetag_unload_module(mod);
> > + unload_codetags = codetag_unload_module(mod);
> > + if (!unload_codetags)
> > + pr_warn("%s: memory allocation(s) from the module still alive, cannot unload cleanly\n",
> > + mod->name);
> > +
>
> Because this is not unwinding anything. Should'd we check if we can
> free all tags first, if we can't then we can't free the module. If we
> can then ensure we don't enter a state where we can't later?
unload_codetags already indicates that someone has a live reference to
one or more tags of that module, so we can't free them. Maybe I
misunderstood your suggestion?
>
> Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists