[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240313164640.616049-65-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:46:31 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 64/73] exit: Fix typo in comment: s/sub-theads/sub-threads
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
[ Upstream commit dcca34754a3f5290406403b8066e3b15dda9f4bf ]
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Stable-dep-of: c1be35a16b2f ("exit: wait_task_zombie: kill the no longer necessary spin_lock_irq(siglock)")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
kernel/exit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index bacdaf980933b..c41bdc0a7f06b 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static int wait_task_zombie(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
* p->signal fields because the whole thread group is dead
* and nobody can change them.
*
- * psig->stats_lock also protects us from our sub-theads
+ * psig->stats_lock also protects us from our sub-threads
* which can reap other children at the same time. Until
* we change k_getrusage()-like users to rely on this lock
* we have to take ->siglock as well.
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists