[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8037775-78cf-4d18-9f8b-9dc5f497ad14@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:51:43 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Update SM8150 videocc
bindings
On 13/03/2024 12:08, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
> Update the videocc device tree bindings for sm8150 to align with the
> latest convention.
Everything is an update. Please explain what you did and why. The "why"
part you tried to cover but I just don't understand what is "align with
the latest convention". What convention?
>
> Fixes: 35d26e9292e2 ("dt-bindings: clock: Add YAML schemas for the QCOM VIDEOCC clock bindings")
What is the bug being fixed here?
> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml | 1 +
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml | 3 ---
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml
> index bad8f019a8d3..e00fdc8ceaa4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties:
> enum:
> - qcom,sm8450-videocc
> - qcom,sm8550-videocc
> + - qcom,sm8150-videocc
Wrong order. Look at the place from where you copied it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists