linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] IB/hfi1: allocate dummy net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240313171604.GB12921@unreal>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:16:04 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
	Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, keescook@...omium.org,
	"open list:HFI1 DRIVER" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] IB/hfi1: allocate dummy net_device dynamically

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:55:26AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:42:52 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > PS: this diff needs d160c66cda0ac8614 ("net: Do not return value from
> > > init_dummy_netdev()") in order to apply and build cleanly.  
> > 
> > We are in merge window now, so if Dennis approves, I will apply it
> > after the merge window
> 
> Can we do a shared branch? We don't want to wait full release cycle
> for a single driver outside of netdev.

No problem, I will create a branch based on -rc1 for it.

Thanks