linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] iio: pressure: add SCALE and RAW values for channels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240313195110.GB1938985@vamoiridPC>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:51:10 +0100
From: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
	lars@...afoo.de, ang.iglesiasg@...il.com, mazziesaccount@...il.com,
	ak@...klinger.de, petre.rodan@...dimension.ro,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, phil@...pberrypi.com, 579lpy@...il.com,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] iio: pressure: add SCALE and RAW values for
 channels

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:03:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:40:04PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> > Add extra IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE and IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW in order to be
> > able to calculate the processed value with standard userspace IIO
> > tools. Can be used for triggered buffers as well.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > +		switch (chan->type) {
> > +		case IIO_HUMIDITYRELATIVE:
> > +			*val = data->chip_info->read_humid(data);
> > +			ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > +			break;
> > +		case IIO_PRESSURE:
> > +			*val = data->chip_info->read_press(data);
> > +			ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > +			break;
> > +		case IIO_TEMP:
> > +			*val = data->chip_info->read_temp(data);
> > +			ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > +			break;
> > +		default:
> > +			ret = -EINVAL;
> > +			break;
> 
> Is it mutex that prevents us from returning here?
> If so, perhaps switching to use cleanup.h first?
> 

I haven't seen cleanup.h used in any file and now that I searched,
only 5-6 are including it. I am currently thinking if the mutex
that already exists is really needed since most of the drivers
don't have it + I feel like this is something that should be done
by IIO, thus maybe it's not even needed here.

> > +		}
> > +		break;
> 
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
> 

Best regards,
Vasileios Amoiridis