[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4q5fetc7qwunhhvieuiubk3g3guc4mr4a5wfmn5u4ox6kyo4p7@olyanpabfvav>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:28:31 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs updates for 6.9
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:22:57PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 02:51:38PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 14:34, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > I liked your MAD suggestion, but the catch was that we need an
> > > exponentially weighted version,
> >
> > The code for the weighted version literally doesn't change.
>
> Well, no, and there's another problem I can't believe I missed until
> now. MAD is defined as median of the absolute deviations, not mean, and
> you can't compute a median incrementally.
>
> So MAD doesn't work here at all.
Sorry, you were talking about mean absolute deviation; that does work
here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists