[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfGKkjxIT9AEd8dy@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:14:26 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>,
Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>,
Hu Haowen <2023002089@...k.tyut.edu.cn>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] gpiolib: Get rid of
gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array()
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:36:18PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 2:51 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > There are only two users left of the gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array().
> > Convert them to very basic legacy APIs (it requires much less work for
> > now) and drop no more used gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array().
>
> That's reasonable and makes the kernel a better place.
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Thank you!
Bart, do you want me to take it via my tree or you want to take directly?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists