[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240313121345.2292-1-hdanton@sina.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:13:45 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+850aaf14624dc0c6d366@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
andrii@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] possible deadlock in __bpf_ringbuf_reserve
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:02:27 +0100 Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 09:41:26AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > syzbot found the following issue on:
> >
> > HEAD commit: df4793505abd Merge tag 'net-6.8-rc8' of git://git.kernel.o..
> > git tree: bpf
> > console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11fd0092180000
> > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=c11c5c676adb61f0
> > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=850aaf14624dc0c6d366
> > compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> > syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1509c4ae180000
> > C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=10babc01180000
> >
> > Downloadable assets:
> > disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d2e80ee1112b/disk-df479350.raw.xz
> > vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/b35ea54cd190/vmlinux-df479350.xz
> > kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/59f69d999ad2/bzImage-df479350.xz
> >
> > IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> > Reported-by: syzbot+850aaf14624dc0c6d366@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> >
> > ============================================
> > WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> > 6.8.0-rc7-syzkaller-gdf4793505abd #0 Not tainted
> > --------------------------------------------
> > strace-static-x/5063 is trying to acquire lock:
> > ffffc900096f10d8 (&rb->spinlock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __bpf_ringbuf_reserve+0x211/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c:424
> >
> > but task is already holding lock:
> > ffffc900098410d8 (&rb->spinlock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __bpf_ringbuf_reserve+0x211/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c:424
> >
> > other info that might help us debug this:
> > Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> >
> > CPU0
> > ----
> > lock(&rb->spinlock);
> > lock(&rb->spinlock);
> >
> > *** DEADLOCK ***
> >
> > May be due to missing lock nesting notation
> >
> > 4 locks held by strace-static-x/5063:
> > #0: ffff88807857e068 (&pipe->mutex/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __pipe_lock fs/pipe.c:103 [inline]
> > #0: ffff88807857e068 (&pipe->mutex/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pipe_write+0x1cc/0x1a40 fs/pipe.c:465
> > #1: ffffffff8e130be0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:298 [inline]
> > #1: ffffffff8e130be0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:750 [inline]
> > #1: ffffffff8e130be0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2380 [inline]
> > #1: ffffffff8e130be0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0x114/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
> > #2: ffffc900098410d8 (&rb->spinlock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __bpf_ringbuf_reserve+0x211/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c:424
> > #3: ffffffff8e130be0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:298 [inline]
> > #3: ffffffff8e130be0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:750 [inline]
> > #3: ffffffff8e130be0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2380 [inline]
> > #3: ffffffff8e130be0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0x114/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
> >
> > stack backtrace:
> > CPU: 0 PID: 5063 Comm: strace-static-x Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-syzkaller-gdf4793505abd #0
> > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> > dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2e0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
> > check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3062 [inline]
> > validate_chain+0x15c0/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3856
> > __lock_acquire+0x1345/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
> > lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
> > __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
> > _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
> > __bpf_ringbuf_reserve+0x211/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c:424
> > ____bpf_ringbuf_reserve kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c:459 [inline]
> > bpf_ringbuf_reserve+0x5c/0x70 kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c:451
> > bpf_prog_9efe54833449f08e+0x2d/0x47
> > bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1231 [inline]
> > __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:651 [inline]
> > bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:658 [inline]
> > __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
>
> hum, scratching my head how this could passed through the prog->active check,
> will try to reproduce
Feel free to take a look at another syzbot report [1,2]
[1] Subject: Re: [syzbot] [ntfs3?] possible deadlock in ntfs_set_state (2)
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZdwSXCaTrzq7mm7Z@boqun-archlinux/
[2] Subject: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] possible deadlock in __bpf_ringbuf_reserve
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/00000000000082883f061388d49e@google.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists