[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240313012451.1693807-12-joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:24:47 -0400
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@...gle.com>,
David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
joseph.salisbury@...onical.com,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it>,
Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/15] sched/deadline: Mark DL server as unthrottled before enqueue
The DL server may not have had its timer started if start_dl_timer()
returns 0 (say the zero-laxity time has already passed). In such cases,
mark the DL task which is about to be enqueued as not throttled and
cancel any previous timers, then do the enqueue.
This fixes the following crash:
[ 9.263331] kernel BUG at kernel/sched/deadline.c:1765!
[ 9.282382] Call Trace:
[ 9.282767] <TASK>
[ 9.283086] ? __die_body+0x62/0xb0
[ 9.283602] ? die+0x9b/0xc0
[ 9.284036] ? do_trap+0xa3/0x170
[ 9.284528] ? enqueue_dl_entity+0x45e/0x460
[ 9.285158] ? enqueue_dl_entity+0x45e/0x460
[ 9.285791] ? handle_invalid_op+0x65/0x80
[ 9.286392] ? enqueue_dl_entity+0x45e/0x460
[ 9.287021] ? exc_invalid_op+0x2f/0x40
[ 9.287585] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
[ 9.288200] ? find_later_rq+0x120/0x120
[ 9.288775] ? fair_server_init+0x40/0x40
[ 9.289364] ? enqueue_dl_entity+0x45e/0x460
[ 9.289989] ? find_later_rq+0x120/0x120
[ 9.290564] dl_task_timer+0x1d7/0x2f0
[ 9.291120] ? find_later_rq+0x120/0x120
[ 9.291695] __run_hrtimer+0x73/0x1b0
[ 9.292238] hrtimer_interrupt+0x216/0x2c0
[ 9.292841] __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x53/0x140
[ 9.293581] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x2d/0x80
[ 9.294285] asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20
The crash can easily be reproduced by adding a 100ms delay as follows:
+int delay_inject_count;
+
static void
enqueue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, int flags)
{
@@ -1827,6 +1830,12 @@ enqueue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, int flags)
setup_new_dl_entity(dl_se);
}
+ // 100ms delay every 20 enqueues.
+ if (delay_inject_count++ > 20) {
+ mdelay(100);
+ delay_inject_count = 0;
+ }
+
/*
* If we are still throttled, eg. we got replenished but are a
* zero-laxity task and still got to wait, don't enqueue.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 5adfc15803c3..1d54231fbaa6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1949,6 +1949,18 @@ enqueue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, int flags)
if (dl_se->dl_throttled && start_dl_timer(dl_se))
return;
+ /*
+ * We're about to enqueue, make sure we're not ->dl_throttled!
+ * In case the timer was not started, say because the 0-lax time
+ * has passed, mark as not throttled and mark unarmed.
+ * Also cancel earlier timers, since letting those run is pointless.
+ */
+ if (dl_se->dl_throttled) {
+ hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&dl_se->dl_timer);
+ dl_se->dl_defer_armed = 0;
+ dl_se->dl_throttled = 0;
+ }
+
__enqueue_dl_entity(dl_se);
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists