[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lxl3zzgq4kgbgxkya2c6zyagcnrcyp2lzewu553mkmgdlooeca@m2wyltn7qpog>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:59:02 +0200
From: Aapo Vienamo <aapo.vienamo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: core: Don't fail mtd_device_parse_register() if
OTP is unsupported
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:24:13AM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> On Mon Mar 11, 2024 at 5:20 PM CET, Aapo Vienamo wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 03:38:17PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > Also, you'll print an error message for EOPNOTSUPP, although that is
> > > not really an error. Is that intended?
> >
> > Well, when we hit this, the functionality of the SPI memory itself is
> > degraded in the sense that the OTP functionality is not available. What
> > would you suggest?
>
> But it's not really an error, I mean, we are ignoring that one on
> purpose now :) I'd just guard it with "if (ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)".
To clarify, are you suggesting a modification like this to the code at
the end of mtd_otp_nvmem_add()?
err:
nvmem_unregister(...);
if (ret != EOPNOTSUPP)
return dev_err_probe(...);
return 0;
Best,
Aapo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists