[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <663bfa89e5ea874c1d96203f113529c618ca1655.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:55:30 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "debug@...osinc.com" <debug@...osinc.com>, "luto@...nel.org"
<luto@...nel.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Liam.Howlett@...cle.com" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, "broonie@...nel.org"
<broonie@...nel.org>, "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "hpa@...or.com"
<hpa@...or.com>, "christophe.leroy@...roup.eu" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "mingo@...hat.com"
<mingo@...hat.com>, "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com"
<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "peterz@...radead.org"
<peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] mm: Use get_unmapped_area_vmflags()
On Wed, 2024-03-13 at 09:05 +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
> What about get_area(), what happens to vm_flags in case that function
> is
> used ?
Shadow stack can only be private and anonymous memory. So this way is
to avoid unnecessary plumbing. And that plumbing becomes quite
extensive when you start intersecting with theĀ
f_ops->get_unmapped_area(), so its pretty fortunate.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists