lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:32:50 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to return EIO when reading after
 device removal

So, I was wondering we can give data even in cp_error case.

On 03/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> Ping,
> 
> Jaegeuk, do you have any comments on this patch?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> On 2024/2/26 16:00, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Any comments?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > On 2024/2/19 11:13, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2024/2/8 8:18, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On 02/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > generic/730 2s ... - output mismatch (see /media/fstests/results//generic/730.out.bad)
> > > > >      --- tests/generic/730.out    2023-08-07 01:39:51.055568499 +0000
> > > > >      +++ /media/fstests/results//generic/730.out.bad    2024-02-06 02:26:43.000000000 +0000
> > > > >      @@ -1,2 +1 @@
> > > > >       QA output created by 730
> > > > >      -cat: -: Input/output error
> > > > >      ...
> > > > >      (Run 'diff -u /media/fstests/tests/generic/730.out /media/fstests/results//generic/730.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
> > > > > Ran: generic/730
> > > > > Failures: generic/730
> > > > > Failed 1 of 1 tests
> > > > > 
> > > > > This patch adds a check condition in f2fs_file_read_iter() to
> > > > > detect cp_error status after device removal, and retrurn -EIO
> > > > > for such case.
> > > > 
> > > > Can we check device removal?
> > > 
> > > We can use blk_queue_dying() to detect device removal, but, IMO, device
> > > removal can almost not happen in Android, not sure for distros or server,
> > > do you want to add this check condition into f2fs_cp_error()?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >   fs/f2fs/file.c | 3 +++
> > > > >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > > > > index 45b7e3610b0f..9e4386d4144c 100644
> > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > > > > @@ -4462,6 +4462,9 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
> > > > >       const loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos;
> > > > >       ssize_t ret;
> > > > > +    if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(F2FS_I_SB(inode))))
> > > > > +        return -EIO;
> > > > > +
> > > > >       if (!f2fs_is_compress_backend_ready(inode))
> > > > >           return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > 2.40.1
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > > Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ