linux-kernel - [PATCH 6.1 55/71] blk-rq-qos: move rq_qos_add and rq_qos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240313163957.615276-56-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:39:41 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1 55/71] blk-rq-qos: move rq_qos_add and rq_qos_del out of line

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

[ Upstream commit b494f9c566ba5fe2cc8abe67fdeb0332c6b48d4b ]

These two functions are rather larger and not in a fast path, so move
them out of line.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230203150400.3199230-13-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Stable-dep-of: f814bdda774c ("blk-wbt: Fix detection of dirty-throttled tasks")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 block/blk-rq-qos.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 block/blk-rq-qos.h | 61 ++--------------------------------------------
 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.c b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
index 88f0fe7dcf545..aae98dcb01ebe 100644
--- a/block/blk-rq-qos.c
+++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
@@ -294,3 +294,63 @@ void rq_qos_exit(struct request_queue *q)
 		rqos->ops->exit(rqos);
 	}
 }
+
+int rq_qos_add(struct request_queue *q, struct rq_qos *rqos)
+{
+	/*
+	 * No IO can be in-flight when adding rqos, so freeze queue, which
+	 * is fine since we only support rq_qos for blk-mq queue.
+	 *
+	 * Reuse ->queue_lock for protecting against other concurrent
+	 * rq_qos adding/deleting
+	 */
+	blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
+	if (rq_qos_id(q, rqos->id))
+		goto ebusy;
+	rqos->next = q->rq_qos;
+	q->rq_qos = rqos;
+	spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
+
+	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
+
+	if (rqos->ops->debugfs_attrs) {
+		mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
+		blk_mq_debugfs_register_rqos(rqos);
+		mutex_unlock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+ebusy:
+	spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
+	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
+	return -EBUSY;
+
+}
+
+void rq_qos_del(struct request_queue *q, struct rq_qos *rqos)
+{
+	struct rq_qos **cur;
+
+	/*
+	 * See comment in rq_qos_add() about freezing queue & using
+	 * ->queue_lock.
+	 */
+	blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
+	for (cur = &q->rq_qos; *cur; cur = &(*cur)->next) {
+		if (*cur == rqos) {
+			*cur = rqos->next;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
+
+	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
+
+	mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
+	blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_rqos(rqos);
+	mutex_unlock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
+}
diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.h b/block/blk-rq-qos.h
index 1ef1f7d4bc3cb..805eee8b031d0 100644
--- a/block/blk-rq-qos.h
+++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.h
@@ -85,65 +85,8 @@ static inline void rq_wait_init(struct rq_wait *rq_wait)
 	init_waitqueue_head(&rq_wait->wait);
 }
 
-static inline int rq_qos_add(struct request_queue *q, struct rq_qos *rqos)
-{
-	/*
-	 * No IO can be in-flight when adding rqos, so freeze queue, which
-	 * is fine since we only support rq_qos for blk-mq queue.
-	 *
-	 * Reuse ->queue_lock for protecting against other concurrent
-	 * rq_qos adding/deleting
-	 */
-	blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
-
-	spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
-	if (rq_qos_id(q, rqos->id))
-		goto ebusy;
-	rqos->next = q->rq_qos;
-	q->rq_qos = rqos;
-	spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
-
-	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
-
-	if (rqos->ops->debugfs_attrs) {
-		mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
-		blk_mq_debugfs_register_rqos(rqos);
-		mutex_unlock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-ebusy:
-	spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
-	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
-	return -EBUSY;
-
-}
-
-static inline void rq_qos_del(struct request_queue *q, struct rq_qos *rqos)
-{
-	struct rq_qos **cur;
-
-	/*
-	 * See comment in rq_qos_add() about freezing queue & using
-	 * ->queue_lock.
-	 */
-	blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
-
-	spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
-	for (cur = &q->rq_qos; *cur; cur = &(*cur)->next) {
-		if (*cur == rqos) {
-			*cur = rqos->next;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
-
-	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
-
-	mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
-	blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_rqos(rqos);
-	mutex_unlock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
-}
+int rq_qos_add(struct request_queue *q, struct rq_qos *rqos);
+void rq_qos_del(struct request_queue *q, struct rq_qos *rqos);
 
 typedef bool (acquire_inflight_cb_t)(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data);
 typedef void (cleanup_cb_t)(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data);
-- 
2.43.0