linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: driver and doc updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:02:15 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
 Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Cc: William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>,
 Linux MTD List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
 Linux ARM List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 Broadcom Kernel List <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
 kursad.oney@...adcom.com, joel.peshkin@...adcom.com,
 anand.gore@...adcom.com, dregan@...l.com, kamal.dasu@...adcom.com,
 tomer.yacoby@...adcom.com, dan.beygelman@...adcom.com,
 Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
 David Regan <dregan@...adcom.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
 Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
 Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: driver and doc updates

On 3/14/24 15:04, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Florian,
> 
> miquel.raynal@...tlin.com wrote on Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:11:01 +0100:
> 
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>> florian.fainelli@...adcom.com wrote on Mon, 26 Feb 2024 09:36:02 -0800:
>>
>>> On 2/22/24 19:47, William Zhang wrote:
>>>> This patch series is an update from the previous version [1] after
>>>> exex_op support and fixes (patch 1 to 4 from the previous version.)
>>>>
>>>> It updates all the BCMBCA SoC to support the nand controller and add
>>>> functions to handle BCMBCA specific needs on ECC and Write Protection
>>>> usage. The device tree document is also updated accordingly with the new
>>>> properties needed by the driver.
>>>>
>>>> In addition there is a bug fix for exec_op helper functions, log level
>>>> adjustment on uncorrectable ECC error and some coding style fixes.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230606231252.94838-1-william.zhang@broadcom.com/
>>>
>>> Miquel, thanks for having applied the patches, we should have discussed ahead of time whether you should take the SoC/board-level DTS changes through your tree or mine, but it's fine either way and should not lead to conflicts in Linus' tree.
>>
>> I'm sorry for not thinking about this ahead of time, I was also not
>> Cced on the other patches, I noticed it (told Willliam) and just forgot
>> about this when I applied the series.
>>
>> It is currently living in -next so if there is any problem I can still
>> act.
>>
>> However for this kind of change I usually apply the bindings and .c
>> changes independently from the DT patches. I believe there is no
>> problem having one or the other being merged first, or do I overlook
>> something?
> 
> What the heck /o\ I just understand now my mistake, I am very truly
> sorry for that...
> 
> You were telling me I should sync with you before taking DT changes,
> and I was so convinced I _did_not_ take the DT, when I looked at the
> branch I did not understand your point. But I am totally sorry I
> actually did take the DTs by mistake and I truly did not notice it.
> Confirmation bias I suppose. My very sincere apologies.
> 
> As mentioned previously, I was not CC'ed on the DT patches, but I
> believe the linux-mtd list was, so the patches didn't appear in my
> inbox, and once I was happy with the binding/driver changes I applied
> it all without noticing the DT changes had sneaked in.
> 
> I'm finally preparing the PR for Linus and I see it now...
> 
> I believe the SoC tree is closed now so it's up to you what I should do
> with them. Let me know if you want me to keep them in my tree and
> forward them to Linus or if I should drop them and you'll take them for
> the next cycle. Also, if I keep them, shall I add some tag of yours on
> these 3 patches? For the record I did not review them.

Yes please add my:

Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>

tag, and it's fine I don't expect that we will get conflicts for those 
files.

> 
> Thanks and again, I'm confused. I never apply DT patches like that,
> your initial remark was more than legitimate.

Not a problem!
-- 
Florian