lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK9=C2UfK=rap06A4GLbbhSvGJYpLHb9LMqU_GuxFo0FVQnJHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:51:53 +0530
From: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
To: 20240307140307.646078-1-apatel@...tanamicro.com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, 
	robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	maz@...nel.org, bjorn@...nel.org, atishp@...shpatra.org, 
	ajones@...tanamicro.com, sunilvl@...tanamicro.com, saravanak@...gle.com, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	dawei.li@...ngroup.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 0/9] Linux RISC-V AIA Support

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:17 AM Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn> wrote:
>
> Hi Anup,
>
> Thanks for the great work on AIA!
>
> Firstly I must apologize for the top posting cuz I miss the series mail for
> my inbox. And for the record, I am replying to [1].
>
> After I checkout riscv_aia_v16 branch at https://github.com/avpatel/linuxgit,
> some call traces about spurious interrupt are screaming:
>
> [    1.244292] irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> [    1.244707] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc6-00055-gd7d4d086b79a #14
> [    1.244932] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> [    1.245130] Call Trace:
> [    1.245337] [<ffffffff80005f32>] dump_backtrace+0x1c/0x24
> [    1.245559] [<ffffffff809023f4>] show_stack+0x2c/0x38
> [    1.245761] [<ffffffff8090ec8c>] dump_stack_lvl+0x3c/0x54
> [    1.245979] [<ffffffff8090ecb8>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
> [    1.246116] [<ffffffff8090368c>] __report_bad_irq+0x3e/0xae
> [    1.246276] [<ffffffff8006a938>] note_interrupt+0x1f4/0x23e
> [    1.246382] [<ffffffff800679e2>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x42/0x50
> [    1.246508] [<ffffffff80067a2c>] handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x68
> [    1.246628] [<ffffffff8006b7a4>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xac/0x176
> [    1.246788] [<ffffffff80066c3c>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x1c/0x2a
> [    1.246928] [<ffffffff80473f0e>] imsic_handle_irq+0x72/0x12a
> [    1.247041] [<ffffffff80066c3c>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x1c/0x2a
> [    1.247165] [<ffffffff80472470>] riscv_intc_aia_irq+0x26/0x38
> [    1.247291] [<ffffffff8090ed0a>] handle_riscv_irq+0x4a/0x74
> [    1.247430] [<ffffffff80918af6>] call_on_irq_stack+0x32/0x40
> [    1.247626] handlers:
> [    1.247721] [<000000004ebb6fe3>] vm_interrupt
> [    1.248314] Disabling IRQ #11
> [    1.303510] irq 12: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> [    1.303700] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc6-00055-gd7d4d086b79a #14
> [    1.304768] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> [    1.305460] Call Trace:
> [    1.305868] [<ffffffff80005f32>] dump_backtrace+0x1c/0x24
> [    1.306621] [<ffffffff809023f4>] show_stack+0x2c/0x38
> [    1.307295] [<ffffffff8090ec8c>] dump_stack_lvl+0x3c/0x54
> [    1.308025] [<ffffffff8090ecb8>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
> [    1.308698] [<ffffffff8090368c>] __report_bad_irq+0x3e/0xae
> [    1.309698] [<ffffffff8006a938>] note_interrupt+0x1f4/0x23e
> [    1.310568] [<ffffffff800679e2>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x42/0x50
> [    1.311542] [<ffffffff80067a2c>] handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x68
> [    1.312298] [<ffffffff8006b7a4>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xac/0x176
> [    1.313127] [<ffffffff80066c3c>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x1c/0x2a
> [    1.315375] [<ffffffff80473f0e>] imsic_handle_irq+0x72/0x12a
> [    1.316163] [<ffffffff80066c3c>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x1c/0x2a
> [    1.317078] [<ffffffff80472470>] riscv_intc_aia_irq+0x26/0x38
> [    1.318036] [<ffffffff8090ed0a>] handle_riscv_irq+0x4a/0x74
> [    1.318934] [<ffffffff8090f3e6>] do_irq+0x4a/0x4c
> [    1.319831] [<ffffffff809189ac>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x64
> [    1.320860] [<ffffffff8091845c>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1a/0x2e
> [    1.321887] [<ffffffff80473d06>] imsic_local_timer_callback+0x50/0x5c
> [    1.322957] [<ffffffff8008ade4>] call_timer_fn.isra.0+0x14/0x5e
> [    1.323781] [<ffffffff8008b44a>] run_timer_softirq+0x388/0x3a8
> [    1.324579] [<ffffffff80918c7e>] __do_softirq+0x100/0x252
> [    1.325304] [<ffffffff80018464>] irq_exit_rcu+0x7c/0xa6
> [    1.326126] [<ffffffff8090ed24>] handle_riscv_irq+0x64/0x74
> [    1.327535] [<ffffffff80918af6>] call_on_irq_stack+0x32/0x40
> [    1.328703] handlers:
> [    1.330724] [<000000008b6c4f15>] serial8250_interrupt
> [    1.331573] Disabling IRQ #12
> [    1.350231] Run /sbin/init as init process
>
> And I take a look on /proc/interrupts, spurious interrupts are happening:
> ~ # cat /proc/interrupts
>            CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3       CPU4       CPU5       CPU6       CPU7       CPU8       CPU9       CPU10      CPU11      CPU12      CPU13      CPU14      CPU15
>  10:         83        222        350        163         71        101        193         68         54         60        174         50         51         48         48         46  RISC-V INTC   5 Edge      riscv-timer
>  11:     100001          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  APLIC-MSI-d000000.aplic   8 Level   -fasteoi   virtio0
>  12:          0     100000          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  APLIC-MSI-d000000.aplic  10 Level   -fasteoi   ttyS0
>  13:          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  APLIC-MSI-d000000.aplic  11 Level   -fasteoi   101000.rtc
> IPI0:         3          8          4          7          7          6          5          4          7          7          7          5          6         10          4          5  Rescheduling interrupts
> IPI1:       727        517        431        448        497        456        514        476        488        466        455        456        443        443        439        433  Function call interrupts
> IPI2:         0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  CPU stop interrupts
> IPI3:         0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  CPU stop (for crash dump) interrupts
> IPI4:         0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  IRQ work interrupts
> IPI5:         0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  Timer broadcast interrupts
>
> But when I switched back to V15, everything is fine.
>
> Here are some of info _maybe_ helpful:
> kernel: d7d4d086b79a11ad8bbcaf732c7830faa3f3192f
> qemu: e1007b6bab5cf97705bf4f2aaec1f607787355b8
> qemu cmdline: qemu-system-riscv64 -M virt,aia=aplic-imsic -m 256M -nographic -kernel ~/src/linux/arch/riscv/boot/Image -drive file=rootfs.img,format=raw,id=hd0  -device virtio-blk-device,drive=hd0 -append "root=/dev/vda rw console=ttyS0" -smp 16
> config: defconfig(make ARCH=riscv defconfig)
>
> And I am happy to provide any extra info if needed.
>
> After I take a git diff and check your changelog:
> [Quoting from [1]]
>  - Simplified aplic_msi_irq_eoi() in PATCH7 based on the section "4.9.2 Special
>    consideration for level-sensitive interrupt sources"  of the RISC-V AIA
>    specification and also provided handler name.
>
> I apologize if I miss something.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240307140307.646078-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com/

The QEMU APLIC emulation of the setipnum register was broken. The
corresponding QEMU fixes are already accepted and queued by the
maintainer.

Please refer, https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240306095722.463296-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com/

Regards,
Anup

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ