linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/73] 5.10.213-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZfKhPaFngJTrTJyt@codewreck.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:03:25 +0900
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/73] 5.10.213-rc1 review

Sasha Levin wrote on Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:45:27PM -0400:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.213 release.
> There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Thanks Sasha for submitting a stable rc review!

If it's not too much trouble, would it be possible to have a different
header in the 00 patch from the other patches for my mailbox?
The mails Greg sends have the X-KernelTest-* headers (patch, tree,
branch etc) only in the cover letter, while all the patches themselves
only have 'X-stable: review' and 'X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore'

I don't really care much what actual tags are on which as long as
there's a way to differentiate that cover letter from the rest so I can
redirect it to a mailbox I actually read to notice there's a new rc to
test, without having all the patches unless I explicitly look for them.

If it's difficult I'll add a regex on the subject for ' 00/' or
something, I'd prefer matching only headers for robustness but just let
me know.

Didn't run into any problem with the patches themselves:

> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-5.10.y&id2=v5.10.212
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Tested 0a70dd1e1aa9 ("Linux 5.10.213-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)

No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@...ark-techno.com>

-- 
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus