[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240314072207.GC4831@thinkpad>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 12:52:07 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@....com>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>, Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
Srikanth Thokala <srikanth.thokala@...el.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/10] PCI: dwc: ep: Call dw_pcie_ep_init_registers()
API directly from all glue drivers
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 11:22:52AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 03:19:47PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > > > @@ -467,6 +467,13 @@ static int dra7xx_add_pcie_ep(struct dra7xx_pcie *dra7xx,
> > > > > > return ret;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + ret = dw_pcie_ep_init_registers(ep);
> > > > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > >
> > > > > Here you are using if (ret) to error check the return from
> > > > > dw_pcie_ep_init_registers().
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > index c0c62533a3f1..8392894ed286 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> > > > > > @@ -1286,6 +1286,13 @@ static int ks_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > > ret = dw_pcie_ep_init(&pci->ep);
> > > > > > if (ret < 0)
> > > > > > goto err_get_sync;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + ret = dw_pcie_ep_init_registers(&pci->ep);
> > > > > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > > >
> > > > > Here you are using if (ret < 0) to error check the return from
> > > > > dw_pcie_ep_init_registers(). Please be consistent.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I maintained the consistency w.r.t individual drivers. Please check them
> > > > individually.
> > > >
> > > > If I maintain consistency w.r.t this patch, then the style will change within
> > > > the drivers.
> > >
> > > Personally, I disagree with that.
> > >
> > > All glue drivers should use the same way of checking dw_pcie_ep_init(),
> > > depending on the kdoc of dw_pcie_ep_init().
> > >
> > > If the kdoc for dw_pcie_ep_init() says returns 0 on success,
> > > then I think that it is strictly more correct to do:
> > >
> > > ret = dw_pcie_ep_init()
> > > if (ret) {
> > > <error handling>
> > > }
> > >
> > > And if a glue driver doesn't look like that, then I think we should change
> > > them. (Same reasoning for dw_pcie_ep_init_registers().)
> > >
> > >
> > > If you read code that looks like:
> > > ret = dw_pcie_ep_init()
> > > if (ret < 0) {
> > > <error handling>
> > > }
> > >
> > > then you assume that is is a function with a kdoc that says it can return 0
> > > or a positive value on success, e.g. a function that returns an index in an
> > > array.
> > >
> >
> > But if you read the same function from the individual drivers, it could present
> > a different opinion because the samantics is different than others.
>
> Is there any glue driver where a positive result from dw_pcie_ep_init() is
> considered valid?
>
>
> >
> > I'm not opposed to keeping the API semantics consistent, but we have to take
> > account of the drivers style as well.
>
> kdoc > "driver style"
> IMO, but you are the maintainer, I just offered my 50 cents :)
>
Those valuable 50 cents :) Looking at it again, I think you are right. We
should honor the API over driver's own style.
I've changed the semantics in next version, thanks!
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists