linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] drm for 6.9-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:49:15 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@...el.com>, 
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 6.9-rc1

On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 21:07, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I've done a trial merge into your tree from a few hours ago, there
> are definitely some slighty messy conflicts, I've pushed a sample
> branch here:

I appreciate your sample merges since I like verifying my end result,
but I think your merge is wrong.

I got two differences when I did the merge. The one in
intel_dp_detect() I think is just syntactic - I ended up placing the

        if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
                intel_psr_init_dpcd(intel_dp);

differently than you did (I did it *after* the tunnel_detect()).

I don't _think,_ that placement matters, but somebody more familiar
with the code should check it out. Added Animesh and Jani to the
participants.

But I think your merge gets the TP_printk() for the xe_bo_move trace
event is actively wrong. You don't have the destination for the move
in the printk.

Or maybe I got it wrong. Our merges end up _close_, but not identical.

               Linus