| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240314-pinctrl-scmi-v5-0-b19576e557f2@nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 21:35:17 +0800
From: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@...m.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol
protocol basic support
Since SCMI 3.2 Spec is released, and this patchset has got R-b/T-b,
is it ok to land this patchset?
This patchset is a rework from Oleksii's RFC v5 patchset
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1698353854.git.oleksii_moisieiev@epam.com/
This patchset introduces some changes based on RFC v5:
- introduce helper get_max_msg_size
- support compatible string
- iterate the id_table
- Support multiple configs in one command
- Added i.MX support
- Patch 5 firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support
is almost same as RFCv5 expect multiple configs support.
- Patch 4 the dt-bindings includes compatible string to support i.MX
- Rebased on 2023-12-15 linux-next/master
If any comments from RFC v5 are missed, I am sorry in advance.
This PINCTRL Protocol is following Version 3.2 SCMI Spec Beta release.
On ARM-based systems, a separate Cortex-M based System Control Processor
(SCP) provides control on pins, as well as with power, clocks, reset
controllers. So implement the driver to support such cases.
The i.MX95 Example as below:
Configuration:
The scmi-pinctrl driver can be configured using DT bindings.
For example:
/ {
sram0: sram@...b1000 {
compatible = "mmio-sram";
reg = <0x0 0x445b1000 0x0 0x400>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x445b1000 0x400>;
scmi_buf0: scmi-sram-section@0 {
compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem";
reg = <0x0 0x80>;
};
scmi_buf1: scmi-sram-section@80 {
compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem";
reg = <0x80 0x80>;
};
};
firmware {
scmi {
compatible = "arm,scmi";
mboxes = <&mu2 5 0>, <&mu2 3 0>, <&mu2 3 1>;
shmem = <&scmi_buf0>, <&scmi_buf1>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
scmi_iomuxc: protocol@19 {
compatible = "fsl,imx95-scmi-pinctrl";
reg = <0x19>;
};
};
};
};
&scmi_iomuxc {
pinctrl_tpm3: tpm3grp {
fsl,pins = <
IMX95_PAD_GPIO_IO12__TPM3_CH2 0x51e
>;
};
};
This patchset has been tested on i.MX95-19x19-EVK board.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
---
Changes in v5:
- Rebased to linux-next next-20240313
- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240223-pinctrl-scmi-v4-0-10eb5a379274@nxp.com
Changes in v4:
- Rebased to next-20240222
- Drop pinctrl-scmi-imx and compatible patches in V3
- Add T-b and R-b collected from v3
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240121-pinctrl-scmi-v3-0-8d94ba79dca8@nxp.com
Changes in v3:
- Add R-b for dt-binding patch
- Use 80 chars per line to align with other scmi drivers
- Add pinctrl_scmi_alloc_configs pinctrl_scmi_free_configs to replace
driver global config_value and config_type array to avoid in parrell
access issue. When num_configs is larger than 4, use alloc, else use
stack.
- Drop the separate MAITAINERS entry for firmware scmi pinctrl
- Use enum type, not u8 when referring the scmi or generic pin conf type
- Drop scmi_pinctrl_config_get_all which is not used at all for now.
- Update copyright year to 2024
- Move the enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type above pinctrl_proto_ops for consistency
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104-pinctrl-scmi-v2-0-a9bd86ab5a84@nxp.com
Changes in v2:
Added comments, and added R-b for Patch 1
Moved the compatile string and i.MX patch to the end, marked NOT APPLY
Patchset based on lore.kernel.org/all/20231221151129.325749-1-cristian.marussi@....com/
Addressed the binding doc issue, dropped i.MX content.
For the firmware pinctrl scmi driver, addressed the comments from Cristian
For the pinctrl scmi driver, addressed comments from Cristian
For the i.MX95 OEM stuff, I not have good idea, expect using compatbile
string. Maybe the firmware public an protocol attribute to indicate it is
VENDOR stuff or NXP use a new protocol id, not 0x19. But I think
current pinctrl-scmi.c not able to support OEM config, should we extend
it with some method? Anyway if patch 1-4 is good enough, they could
be picked up first.
Since I am only able to test the patch on i.MX95 which not support
geneirc pinconf, only OEM configs are tested in my side.
---
Oleksii Moisieiev (1):
firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support
Peng Fan (3):
firmware: arm_scmi: introduce helper get_max_msg_size
dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support pinctrl protocol
pinctrl: Implementation of the generic scmi-pinctrl driver
.../devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 50 ++
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 17 +
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/pinctrl.c | 908 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h | 3 +
drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-scmi.c | 593 ++++++++++++++
include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 75 ++
10 files changed, 1660 insertions(+)
---
base-commit: 6bb954de844bc99bf9e90f304a41d9477efe468b
change-id: 20231215-pinctrl-scmi-4c5b0374f4c6
Best regards,
--
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists