linux-kernel - Re: [Test Failure Report] exec: Test failures in execveat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:05:26 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	"kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [Test Failure Report] exec: Test failures in execveat

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:08:36PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> On 3/8/24 1:39 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:22:27PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> >> I've tested this patch. Still getting same failures.
> > 
> > Okay, thanks for testing!
> > 
> > What environment are you testing under? It would seem like some unexpected
> > userspace conditions exist that the test isn't prepared for. (I was able
> > to reproduce one error with /bin/dash, for example, but not the others,
> > so something must be different in the set up.)
> I'm testing on Debian Bookworm with v6.1, v6.7 and next-20240304 kernels.
> I've tested it on another VM which is also Debian Bookworm. The default
> shell is dash on Debian as well.

Do you know which kernel version this _passes_ on? I haven't been able
to find when this actually returned the expected values...

-- 
Kees Cook