linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add qfprom node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 22:13:59 +0530
From: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add qfprom node

Sorry for the late reply, was on vacation.

On 3/6/2024 9:24 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/6/24 13:26, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>> Add the qfprom node for sm8450 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>> index b86be34a912b..02089a388d03 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>> @@ -4575,6 +4575,13 @@
>>               };
>>           };
>> +        qfprom: efuse@...c8000 {
>> +            compatible = "qcom,sm8450-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom";
>> +            reg = <0 0x221c8000 0 0x1000>;
> 
> Is is really only 0x1000-long? Also, is the base you put
> here the ECC-corrected part (if that still exists)?

No, its not.

Entire fuse space is this.
0x221C0000-0x221Cbfff

ECC corrected range is this 0x221C2000-0x221C3fff and High level OS
does have a access to ECC range however, they are not recommended for
SW usage.

Above mentioned SW range(4) in the patch is  one and only accessible 
range available out of 0-7 SW ranges(0x221C4000-0x221Cbfff with each
size 0x1000) and does not have ECC fuses.

All the downstream use cases are getting fulfilled with this.

-Mukesh

> 
> Konrad