linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] KVM changes for Linux 6.9 merge window

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:49:57 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM changes for Linux 6.9 merge window

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 04:32:10PM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 03:28:29PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > The immediate cause of the failure is commit b80b701d5a67 ("KVM:
> > arm64: Snapshot all non-zero RES0/RES1 sysreg fields for later
> > checking") but I hope it worked at *some* point. I can't see how.
> 
> Looks like commit fdd867fe9b32 ("arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for
> ID_AA64DFR1_EL1") changed the register definition that tripped the
> BUILD_BUG_ON().
> 
> But it'd be *wildly* unfair to blame that, the KVM assertions are added
> out of fear of new register definitions breaking our sysreg emulation.
> 
> > I would guess / assume that commit cfc680bb04c5 ("arm64: sysreg: Add
> > layout for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1") is also involved, but having recoiled in
> > horror from the awk script, I really can't even begin to guess at what
> > is going on.
> > 
> > Bringing in other people who hopefully can sort this out.
> 
> At this point I'm heavily biased towards just dropping the KVM checks
> for now than attempt a fix-forward. We can work things out better with
> arm64 folks next release.
> 
> So unless anyone screams, I say we revert:
> 
>   99101dda29e3 ("KVM: arm64: Make build-time check of RES0/RES1 bits optional")
>   891766581dea ("KVM: arm64: Add debugfs file for guest's ID registers")

Duh, that second one should actually be:

  b80b701d5a67 ("KVM: arm64: Snapshot all non-zero RES0/RES1 sysreg fields for later checking")

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver