| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZfOhB9ZByTZcBy4u@lothringen>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 02:14:47 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
neeraj.upadhyay@....com, urezki@...il.com,
qiang.zhang1211@...il.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
chenzhongjin@...wei.com, yangjihong1@...wei.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH] timer/migration: Remove buggy early return on deactivation
[was Re: Unexplained long boot delays [Was Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for
v6.9]]
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 03:05:53PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> I notice CPU3 didn't have its own non-deferrable timer queued (local or
> global), so could the following happen?
>
> timer_base_try_to_set_idle():
> __get_next_timer_interrupt():
> fetch_next_timer_interrupt():
> // nextevt_local == nextevt_global == basej + NEXT_TIMER_MAX_DELTA
> // tevt->local == tevt->gloabl = KTIME_MAX
> timer_use_tmigr():
> tmigr_cpu_deactivate():
> __tmigr_cpu_deactivate():
> // tmc->cpuevt.ignore untouched still == true
> walk_groups(&tmigr_inactive_up, ...):
> tmigr_inactive_up():
> data->remote = true;
> tmigr_update_events():
> if (child) { // child is NULL
> ...
> } else {
> first_childevt = evt = data->evt;
>
> if (evt->ignore && !remote)
> return true; // no remote tick is picked.
> ...
> }
Nice catch! Florian can you try the following?
>From b0e335371ed758f68bf4f501246298c98a615b04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:21:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] timer/migration: Remove buggy early return on deactivation
When a CPU enters into idle and deactivates itself from the timer
migration hierarchy without any global timer of its own to propagate,
the group event of that CPU is set to "ignore" and tmigr_update_events()
accordingly performs an early return without considering timers queued
by other CPUs.
If the hierarchy has a single level, and the CPU is the last one to
enter idle, it will ignore others' global timers, as in the following
layout:
[GRP0:0]
migrator = 0
active = 0
nextevt = T0i
/ \
0 1
active (T0i) idle (T1)
0) CPU 0 is active thus its event is ignored (the letter 'i') and so are
upper levels' events. CPU 1 is idle and has the timer T1 enqueued.
[GRP0:0]
migrator = NONE
active = NONE
nextevt = T0i
/ \
0 1
idle (T0i) idle (T1)
1) CPU 0 goes idle without global event queued. Therefore KTIME_MAX is
pushed as its next expiry and its own event kept as "ignore". As a result
tmigr_update_events() ignores T1 and CPU 0 goes to idle with T1
unhandled.
This isn't proper to single level hierarchy though. A similar issue,
although slightly different, may arise on multi-level:
[GRP1:0]
migrator = GRP0:0
active = GRP0:0
nextevt = T0:0i, T0:1
/ \
[GRP0:0] [GRP0:1]
migrator = 0 migrator = NONE
active = 0 active = NONE
nextevt = T0i nextevt = T2
/ \ / \
0 (T0i) 1 (T1) 2 (T2) 3
idle idle idle idle
0) CPU 0 is active thus its event is ignored (the letter 'i') and so are
upper levels' events. CPU 1 is idle and has the timer T1 enqueued.
CPU 2 also has a timer. The expiry order is T0 (ignored) < T1 < T2
[GRP1:0]
migrator = GRP0:0
active = GRP0:0
nextevt = T0:0i, T0:1
/ \
[GRP0:0] [GRP0:1]
migrator = NONE migrator = NONE
active = NONE active = NONE
nextevt = T0i nextevt = T2
/ \ / \
0 (T0i) 1 (T1) 2 (T2) 3
idle idle idle idle
1) CPU 0 goes idle without global event queued. Therefore KTIME_MAX is
pushed as its next expiry and its own event kept as "ignore". As a result
tmigr_update_events() ignores T1. The change only propagated up to 1st
level so far.
[GRP1:0]
migrator = NONE
active = NONE
nextevt = T0:1
/ \
[GRP0:0] [GRP0:1]
migrator = NONE migrator = NONE
active = NONE active = NONE
nextevt = T0i nextevt = T2
/ \ / \
0 (T0i) 1 (T1) 2 (T2) 3
idle idle idle idle
2) The change now propagates up to the top. tmigr_update_events() finds
that the child event is ignored and thus removes it. The top level next
event is now T2 which is returned to CPU 0 as its next effective expiry
to take account for as the global idle migrator. However T1 has been
ignored along the way, leaving it unhandled.
Fix those issues with removing the buggy related early return. Ignored
child events must not prevent from evaluating the other events within
the same group.
Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Reported-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
---
kernel/time/timer_migration.c | 20 --------------------
1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_migration.c b/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
index 8f49b6b96dfd..611cd904f035 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
@@ -751,26 +751,6 @@ bool tmigr_update_events(struct tmigr_group *group, struct tmigr_group *child,
first_childevt = evt = data->evt;
- /*
- * Walking the hierarchy is required in any case when a
- * remote expiry was done before. This ensures to not lose
- * already queued events in non active groups (see section
- * "Required event and timerqueue update after a remote
- * expiry" in the documentation at the top).
- *
- * The two call sites which are executed without a remote expiry
- * before, are not prevented from propagating changes through
- * the hierarchy by the return:
- * - When entering this path by tmigr_new_timer(), @evt->ignore
- * is never set.
- * - tmigr_inactive_up() takes care of the propagation by
- * itself and ignores the return value. But an immediate
- * return is required because nothing has to be done in this
- * level as the event could be ignored.
- */
- if (evt->ignore && !remote)
- return true;
-
raw_spin_lock(&group->lock);
childstate.state = 0;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists