linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/73] 5.10.213-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:52:45 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/73] 5.10.213-rc1 review

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 04:03:25PM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>Sasha Levin wrote on Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:45:27PM -0400:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.213 release.
>> There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>
>Thanks Sasha for submitting a stable rc review!
>
>If it's not too much trouble, would it be possible to have a different
>header in the 00 patch from the other patches for my mailbox?
>The mails Greg sends have the X-KernelTest-* headers (patch, tree,
>branch etc) only in the cover letter, while all the patches themselves
>only have 'X-stable: review' and 'X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore'
>
>I don't really care much what actual tags are on which as long as
>there's a way to differentiate that cover letter from the rest so I can
>redirect it to a mailbox I actually read to notice there's a new rc to
>test, without having all the patches unless I explicitly look for them.
>
>If it's difficult I'll add a regex on the subject for ' 00/' or
>something, I'd prefer matching only headers for robustness but just let
>me know.

I should be able to adjust my scripts to match what Greg does. Thanks
for pointing it out!

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha