[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SJ1PR21MB3457C456D13346088AC78356CE282@SJ1PR21MB3457.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:03:49 +0000
From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@...ux.microsoft.com>, Konstantin Taranov
<kotaranov@...rosoft.com>, "sharmaajay@...rosoft.com"
<sharmaajay@...rosoft.com>, "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>, "leon@...nel.org"
<leon@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH rdma-next 4/4] RDMA/mana_ib: Use struct mana_ib_queue for
RAW QPs
> +struct mana_ib_raw_qp {
> + /* Work queue info */
> + struct mana_ib_queue queue;
> + mana_handle_t tx_object;
> +};
> +
> struct mana_ib_qp {
> struct ib_qp ibqp;
>
> - /* Work queue info */
> - struct ib_umem *sq_umem;
> - int sqe;
> - u64 sq_gdma_region;
> - u64 sq_id;
> - mana_handle_t tx_object;
> + struct mana_ib_raw_qp sq;
What's the naming scheme for RC? Maybe use raw_sq here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists