lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:31:06 -0700
From: Ron Economos <re@...z.net>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
 Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
 patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
 Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/71] 6.1.82-rc1 review

On 3/15/24 7:49 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/15/24 8:42 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:14:57AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 04:40:53PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 3/14/24 4:35 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 04:04:59PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/14/24 3:12 PM, Mateusz Jo?czyk wrote:
>>>>>>> W dniu 13.03.2024 o 22:27, Mateusz Jo?czyk pisze:
>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.03.2024 o 21:13, Mateusz Jo?czyk pisze:
>>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.03.2024 o 17:38, Sasha Levin pisze:
>>>>>>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.82 release.
>>>>>>>>>> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>>>>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>>>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Responses should be made by Fri Mar 15 04:39:56 PM UTC 2024.
>>>>>>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>>>>>>>         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-6.1.y&id2=v6.1.81
>>>>>>>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>>>>>>>>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
>>>>>>>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Sasha
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kernel hangs during early boot. No console messages, nothing in pstore.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tested on a HP 17-by0001nw laptop with an Intel Kaby Lake CPU (Intel i3-7020U) and Ubuntu 20.04.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This CPU is not affected by RFDS (at least according to the Kconfig message), so I have set
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> CONFIG_MITIGATION_RFDS=n
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> in Kconfig. I do not have any updated microcode (if any will be provided at all for this CPU).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mateusz
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>> Bisected down to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> commit d3d517a95e83a7d89e1ff511da1a0a31c9234155
>>>>>>> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>>>>>>> Date:   Fri Feb 3 16:03:54 2023 +0100
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     blk-rq-qos: make rq_qos_add and rq_qos_del more useful
>>>>>> Do you have:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> commit e33b93650fc5364f773985a3e961e24349330d97
>>>>>> Author: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
>>>>>> Date:   Tue Feb 28 03:16:54 2023 -0800
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    blk-iocost: Pass gendisk to ioc_refresh_params
>>>>>>
>>>>>> in there?
>>>>> It's not in the 6.1 tree, do we need it?
>>>> If the bisected commit is in there, then yes we need it. It's marked as
>>>> fixes that, so puzzled why it isn't in there?
>>> Sorry, I take it back - both e33b93650fc5 ("blk-iocost: Pass gendisk to
>>> ioc_refresh_params") and d3d517a95e83 ("blk-rq-qos: make rq_qos_add and
>>> rq_qos_del more useful") are currently in the 6.1 tree.
> I didn't see e33b93650fc5 in there, but maybe it was part of the series
> that this is about.
>
>> I'll go ahead and drop the backport of f814bdda774c ("blk-wbt: Fix
>> detection of dirty-throttled tasks") as well as the dependencies (which
>> is where this issue bisected to), and all follow-up fixes.
>>
>> We can revisit this for the next release.
> Sounds reasonable.
>
Seeing this on RISC-V also. Here's the oops.

[    2.030135] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 
virtual address 0000000000000050
[    2.038233] Oops [#1]
[    2.040420] Modules linked in:
[    2.043461] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.1.82-rc1 #2
[    2.049717] Hardware name: SiFive HiFive Unmatched A00 (DT)
[    2.055276] epc : wbt_queue_depth_changed+0x18/0xb6
[    2.060138]  ra : wbt_init+0x118/0x198
[    2.063871] epc : ffffffff8050e942 ra : ffffffff8050f16e sp : 
ffffffd880087c80
[    2.071087]  gp : ffffffff81a3e3a8 tp : ffffffd87ffe8d40 t0 : 
ffffffdbfed53668
[    2.078294]  t1 : 0000000000000000 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : 
ffffffd880087ca0
[    2.085507]  s1 : ffffffd8800fa458 a0 : ffffffd8800fa458 a1 : 
ffffffff813442a8
[    2.092714]  a2 : ffffffff81b148e0 a3 : 00000000001e8480 a4 : 
0000000000000000
[    2.099923]  a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 
0000000000000000
[    2.107131]  s2 : ffffffd88086a800 s3 : ffffffd880870000 s4 : 
ffffffd8808702c0
[    2.114340]  s5 : ffffffd880870088 s6 : ffffffd8808702a0 s7 : 
ffffffff80e6d580
[    2.121550]  s8 : 0000000000000008 s9 : ffffffff80c00106 s10: 
0000000000000000
[    2.128759]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000000 t4 : 
0000000000000000
[    2.135967]  t5 : 0000000000000000 t6 : 0000000000000000
[    2.141264] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: 0000000000000050 cause: 
000000000000000d
[    2.149171] [<ffffffff8050e942>] wbt_queue_depth_changed+0x18/0xb6
[    2.155337] [<ffffffff8050f16e>] wbt_init+0x118/0x198
[    2.160371] [<ffffffff8050f25a>] wbt_enable_default+0x6c/0x90
[    2.166104] [<ffffffff804d7822>] blk_register_queue+0x17c/0x1b2
[    2.172012] [<ffffffff804ec420>] device_add_disk+0x1f6/0x36c
[    2.177657] [<ffffffff806c3e7a>] loop_add+0x2a0/0x31a
[    2.182696] [<ffffffff80c36452>] loop_init+0x10c/0x138
[    2.187819] [<ffffffff8000293e>] do_one_initcall+0x5a/0x1e2
[    2.193381] [<ffffffff80c018c2>] kernel_init_freeable+0x28c/0x308
[    2.199460] [<ffffffff80af7e0c>] kernel_init+0x32/0x16e
[    2.204669] [<ffffffff80003ed4>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x16
[    2.210372] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[    2.214956] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! 
exitcode=0x0000000b
[    2.222572] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
[    2.226493] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill 
init! exitcode=0x0000000b ]---


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ