[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240316-germinate-browsing-6865db3a44d7@spud>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 16:20:03 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>
Cc: Amrit Anand <quic_amrianan@...cinc.com>, robh@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...cinc.com,
peter.griffin@...aro.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: qcom: Update DT bindings for
multiple DT
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 02:20:38PM +0000, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> On 14/03/2024 12:11, Amrit Anand wrote:
> 2. A top level board-id property that isn't namespaced implies that it
> isn't vendor specific, but the proposed implementation doesn't even
> pretend to be vendor agnostic.
I pointed out previously that the Chromebook guys had some similar
issues with dtb selection when the OEM varies parts but there does not
seem to be any of them on CC here.
There's definitely a generic problem to be solved here but I don't see
an effort made to involve the other people known to have the same
problems and this is all highly vendor specific.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists