linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 08/12] firmware: qcom: qseecom: convert to using the TZ allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <vevlpit6xttrrpse6lxw43vnmf7hpoxsovoofrdvam7dmmvyyh@5bajhnotdr3y>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:24:36 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>, 
	Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>, Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>, 
	Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>, Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, 
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...cinc.com, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, Deepti Jaggi <quic_djaggi@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/12] firmware: qcom: qseecom: convert to using the
 TZ allocator

On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 05:18:18PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:53 PM Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:54:02AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > >
> > > I disagree. If we have a better interface in place, then let's use it
> > > right away, otherwise it's just useless churn.
> > >
> >
> > The functional change and the use of cleanup macros, could be done
> > independently of each other, each one fully beneficial on their own.
> >
> > As such I don't find it hard to claim that they are two independent
> > changes.
> >
> 
> This series would be 50% bigger for no reason if we split every patch
> using the new allocator into two.

I'm not asking you to split every patch into two, unless that makes
sense.

> I absolutely don't see how this makes any sense.

I find it unnecessarily hard to determine which parts of _this_ patch is
functional and which is cleanup.

> We're removing the calls to old interfaces and using
> the new ones instead. The new ones happen to support cleanup so we use
> it right away. If the old ones supported cleanup then maybeeee it
> would make some sense to convert them first and then use tzmem. As it
> is, there's really no point.
> 

The old interface is kzalloc(). I haven't used the cleanup mechanism
myself yet, but are you saying that there's no cleanup support for
kzalloc()?

Regards,
Bjorn