linux-kernel - Re: [patch 5/9] x86: Cure per CPU madness on UP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg50AGnzhmOK0TNqDN99T3dWd747h3y-ZFuv4bNZ4Q0tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 18:23:12 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org, 
	Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, lkp@...el.com, 
	oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 5/9] x86: Cure per CPU madness on UP

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 18:11, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> You wish. We still support 486 and some of the still produced 486 clones
> do not have a local APIC.

Ouch. I was _sure_ we had dropped i486 support too due to cmpxchg8b.

But apparently that was just a discussion, and my wishful thinking,
and we never actually followed through.

         Linus