[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240316200015.GAZfX6T9ftKSv0-Zs5@fat_crate.local>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:00:15 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>,
Huang Yiwei <quic_hyiwei@...cinc.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com>,
linke li <lilinke99@...com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: Updates for v6.9
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 11:42:42AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Now, I'm not suggesting anything like the multiple topic branches from
> -tip (from a quick check, there's been a total of 25 tip/tip topic
> branches merged just this merge window), but for clear new features
> definitely.
So some of those branches are really tiny (1-2 patches) during some
cycles so I have often wondered whether I should merge those small
branches into a single pull...
So as not to have too many tiny pull requests.
Any preference?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists