[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240317-okay-rinsing-3f730007fd3c@spud>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 14:52:44 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
michal.simek@....com, ben.levinsky@....com,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Versal platform support
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 02:50:27PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 02:15:31PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> > AMD-Xilinx Versal platform is successor of ZynqMP platform. Real-time
> > Processor Unit R5 cluster IP on Versal is same as of ZynqMP Platform.
>
> > Only difference is power-domains ID needed by power management firmware.
> > Hence, keeping the compatible property same as of zynqmp node.
>
> No, don't be lazy. Add a compatible with a fallback please.
> This doesn't apply to linux-next either FYI.
Ordinarily'd I'd not even bother applying a patch like this and I
wouldn't notice, but the diff for the versal-net patch is difficult to
read without colour-moved enabled and since I can't apply this I'm not
going to review that patch.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists