[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bANnehyxC4qqgG3Qsj7UwM81PMQRkX_XrkZb=RoK7re5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 11:14:41 -0400
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, x86@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, brauner@...nel.org,
bristot@...hat.com, bsegall@...gle.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
dianders@...omium.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, eric.devolder@...cle.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, hch@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com, jgg@...pe.ca, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
jroedel@...e.de, juri.lelli@...hat.com, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
kinseyho@...gle.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, lstoakes@...il.com,
luto@...nel.org, mgorman@...e.de, mic@...ikod.net,
michael.christie@...cle.com, mingo@...hat.com, mjguzik@...il.com,
mst@...hat.com, npiggin@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, pmladek@...e.com,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, surenb@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, urezki@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 04/14] fork: Remove assumption that vm_area->nr_pages equals
to THREAD_SIZE
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 10:45 AM Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>
> Le 11/03/2024 à 17:46, Pasha Tatashin a écrit :
> > In many places number of pages in the stack is detremined via
> > (THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE). There is also a BUG_ON() that ensures that
> > (THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE) is indeed equals to vm_area->nr_pages.
> >
> > However, with dynamic stacks, the number of pages in vm_area will grow
> > with stack, therefore, use vm_area->nr_pages to determine the actual
> > number of pages allocated in stack.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/fork.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> > index 60e812825a7a..a35f4008afa0 100644
> > --- a/kernel/fork.c
> > +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> > @@ -243,13 +243,11 @@ static int free_vm_stack_cache(unsigned int cpu)
> >
> > static int memcg_charge_kernel_stack(struct vm_struct *vm)
>
> Maybe s/vm/vm_area/ as done in 03/14?
Yes, I will add it to 03/14.
Thank you,
Pasha
>
> CJ
>
> > {
> > - int i;
> > - int ret;
> > + int i, ret, nr_pages;
> > int nr_charged = 0;
> >
> > - BUG_ON(vm->nr_pages != THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE);
> > -
> > - for (i = 0; i < THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE; i++) {
> > + nr_pages = vm->nr_pages;
> > + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> > ret = memcg_kmem_charge_page(vm->pages[i], GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> > if (ret)
> > goto err;
> > @@ -531,9 +529,10 @@ static void account_kernel_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, int account)
> > {
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK)) {
> > struct vm_struct *vm = task_stack_vm_area(tsk);
> > - int i;
> > + int i, nr_pages;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE; i++)
> > + nr_pages = vm->nr_pages;
> > + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++)
> > mod_lruvec_page_state(vm->pages[i], NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB,
> > account * (PAGE_SIZE / 1024));
> > } else {
> > @@ -551,10 +550,11 @@ void exit_task_stack_account(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK)) {
> > struct vm_struct *vm;
> > - int i;
> > + int i, nr_pages;
> >
> > vm = task_stack_vm_area(tsk);
> > - for (i = 0; i < THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE; i++)
> > + nr_pages = vm->nr_pages;
> > + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++)
> > memcg_kmem_uncharge_page(vm->pages[i], 0);
> > }
> > }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists