[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240317165017.GD1927156@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 09:50:17 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] mm/madvise: make MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE)
handle VM_FAULT_RETRY properly
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 05:12:58PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Derrick reports that in some cases where pread() would fail with -EIO and
> mmap()+access would generate a SIGBUS signal, MADV_POPULATE_READ /
> MADV_POPULATE_WRITE will keep retrying forever and not fail with -EFAULT.
>
> It all boils down to missing VM_FAULT_RETRY handling. Let's try to handle
> that in a better way, similar to how ordinary GUP handles it.
>
> Details in patch #1. In short, move special MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE)
> VMA handling into __get_user_pages(), and make faultin_page_range()
> call __get_user_pages_locked(), which handles VM_FAULT_RETRY. Further,
> avoid the now-useless madvise VMA walk, because __get_user_pages() will
> perform the VMA lookup either way.
>
> I briefly played with handling the FOLL_MADV_POPULATE checks in
> __get_user_pages() a bit differently, integrating them with existing
> handling, but it ended up looking worse. So I decided to keep it simple.
>
> Likely, we need better selftests, but the reproducer from Darrick might
> be a bit hard to convert into a simple selftest.
>
> Note that using mlock() in Darricks reproducer results in a similar
> endless retry. Likely, that is not what we want, and we should handle
> VM_FAULT_RETRY in populate_vma_page_range() / __mm_populate() as well.
> However, similarly using __get_user_pages_locked() might be more
> complicated, because of the advanced VMA handling in
> populate_vma_page_range().
>
> Further, most populate_vma_page_range() callers simply ignore the return
> values, so it's unclear in which cases we expect to just silently fail, or
> where we'd want to retry+fail or endlessly retry instead.
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
After a few days I haven't seen any problems, so
Tested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
--D
>
> David Hildenbrand (2):
> mm/madvise: make MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE) handle VM_FAULT_RETRY
> properly
> mm/madvise: don't perform madvise VMA walk for
> MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE)
>
> mm/gup.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> mm/internal.h | 10 ++++++----
> mm/madvise.c | 43 +++++++++++++---------------------------
> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: f48159f866f422371bb1aad10eb4d05b29ca4d8c
> --
> 2.43.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists