[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <12E5C279-ADB1-463E-83E2-0A4F5D193754@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:47:43 +0800
From: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Question about ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce litmus
Hi,
I’m playing with the LKMM, then I saw the ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.
The original litmus is as follows:
------------------------------------------------------
P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
spin_lock(mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
P1(int *y, int *z, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
int r0;
spin_lock(mylock);
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
WRITE_ONCE(*z, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
P2(int *x, int *z)
{
int r1;
int r2;
r2 = READ_ONCE(*z);
smp_mb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 2:r2=1 /\ 2:r1=0)
------------------------------------------------------
Of course, the result is Never.
But when I delete P0’s spin_lock and P1’s spin_unlock:
-------------------------------------------------------
P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
P1(int *y, int *z, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
int r0;
spin_lock(mylock);
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
WRITE_ONCE(*z, 1);
}
P2(int *x, int *z)
{
int r1;
int r2;
r2 = READ_ONCE(*z);
smp_mb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 2:r2=1 /\ 2:r1=0)
------------------------------------------------------
Then herd told me the result is Sometimes.
Is this expected?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists