| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALm+0cXCK5dj+a8YNe-etxVjJwChPtSeDDL3M7cZxDO1OCTR9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 15:16:43 +0800
From: Z qiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: frederic@...nel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcutorture: Make rcutorture support print rcu-tasks gp state
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 03:23:57PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> > This commit make rcu-tasks related rcutorture test support rcu-tasks
> > gp state printing when the writer stall occurs or the at the end of
> > rcutorture test.
> >
> > The test is as follows:
> > [ 3872.548702] tasks-tracing: Start-test grace-period state: g4560 f0x0
> > [ 4332.661283] tasks-tracing: End-test grace-period state: g41540 f0x0 total-gps=36980
> >
> > [ 4401.381138] tasks: Start-test grace-period state: g8 f0x0
> > [ 4565.619354] tasks: End-test grace-period state: g1732 f0x0 total-gps=1724
> >
> > [ 4589.006917] tasks-rude: Start-test grace-period state: g8 f0x0
> > [ 5059.379321] tasks-rude: End-test grace-period state: g8508 f0x0 total-gps=8500
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
>
> Again, good eyes, and that fix would work. But wouldn't it make more
> sense to create a new cur_ops function pointer for these functions?
> That might allow getting rid of the *_FLAVOR checks and values, plus
> simplify the code a bit. To make the function signatures work out,
> there would need to be an intermediate SRCU function to supply the right
> rcu_struct pointer.
>
> This would shorten and simplify the code a bit.
>
> Or is there some reason that this won't work?
Hi, Paul
Thanks for your suggestion, I will resend with reference to the
suggestions above.
Thanks
Zqiang
>
> Why didn't I do that to start with? Well, the various RCU flavors
> appeared one at a time over some years... ;-)
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/rcu.h | 8 ++++++++
> > kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 3 +++
> > kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> > index 86fce206560e..3353e3697645 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> > @@ -556,6 +556,14 @@ static inline unsigned long rcu_get_jiffies_lazy_flush(void) { return 0; }
> > static inline void rcu_set_jiffies_lazy_flush(unsigned long j) { }
> > #endif
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC
> > +void rcutaskstorture_get_gp_data(enum rcutorture_type test_type, int *flags,
> > + unsigned long *gp_seq);
> > +#else
> > +static inline void rcutaskstorture_get_gp_data(enum rcutorture_type test_type, int *flags,
> > + unsigned long *gp_seq) { }
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #if defined(CONFIG_TREE_RCU)
> > void rcutorture_get_gp_data(enum rcutorture_type test_type, int *flags,
> > unsigned long *gp_seq);
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> > index dd7d5ba45740..91c03f37fd97 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> > @@ -2267,6 +2267,7 @@ rcu_torture_stats_print(void)
> > &flags, &gp_seq);
> > srcutorture_get_gp_data(cur_ops->ttype, srcu_ctlp,
> > &flags, &gp_seq);
> > + rcutaskstorture_get_gp_data(cur_ops->ttype, &flags, &gp_seq);
> > wtp = READ_ONCE(writer_task);
> > pr_alert("??? Writer stall state %s(%d) g%lu f%#x ->state %#x cpu %d\n",
> > rcu_torture_writer_state_getname(),
> > @@ -3391,6 +3392,7 @@ rcu_torture_cleanup(void)
> >
> > rcutorture_get_gp_data(cur_ops->ttype, &flags, &gp_seq);
> > srcutorture_get_gp_data(cur_ops->ttype, srcu_ctlp, &flags, &gp_seq);
> > + rcutaskstorture_get_gp_data(cur_ops->ttype, &flags, &gp_seq);
> > pr_alert("%s: End-test grace-period state: g%ld f%#x total-gps=%ld\n",
> > cur_ops->name, (long)gp_seq, flags,
> > rcutorture_seq_diff(gp_seq, start_gp_seq));
> > @@ -3763,6 +3765,7 @@ rcu_torture_init(void)
> > rcu_torture_print_module_parms(cur_ops, "Start of test");
> > rcutorture_get_gp_data(cur_ops->ttype, &flags, &gp_seq);
> > srcutorture_get_gp_data(cur_ops->ttype, srcu_ctlp, &flags, &gp_seq);
> > + rcutaskstorture_get_gp_data(cur_ops->ttype, &flags, &gp_seq);
> > start_gp_seq = gp_seq;
> > pr_alert("%s: Start-test grace-period state: g%ld f%#x\n",
> > cur_ops->name, (long)gp_seq, flags);
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > index e83adcdb49b5..b1254cf3c210 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > @@ -2149,6 +2149,31 @@ late_initcall(rcu_tasks_verify_schedule_work);
> > static void rcu_tasks_initiate_self_tests(void) { }
> > #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
> >
> > +void rcutaskstorture_get_gp_data(enum rcutorture_type test_type, int *flags,
> > + unsigned long *gp_seq)
> > +{
> > + switch (test_type) {
> > + case RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> > + *gp_seq = rcu_seq_current(&rcu_tasks.tasks_gp_seq);
> > +#endif
> > + break;
> > + case RCU_TASKS_RUDE_FLAVOR:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
> > + *gp_seq = rcu_seq_current(&rcu_tasks_rude.tasks_gp_seq);
> > +#endif
> > + break;
> > + case RCU_TASKS_TRACING_FLAVOR:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
> > + *gp_seq = rcu_seq_current(&rcu_tasks_trace.tasks_gp_seq);
> > +#endif
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcutaskstorture_get_gp_data);
> > +
> > void __init tasks_cblist_init_generic(void)
> > {
> > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists