| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKPbEqophdVjDfzLOCSbKYKOLsvPr1Eyiy6U9XuTZwxjoEUTTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:12:58 -0700
From: "Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" <horenchuang@...edance.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@...il.com>, aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, mhocko@...e.com,
tj@...nel.org, john@...alactic.com, Eishan Mirakhur <emirakhur@...ron.com>,
Vinicius Tavares Petrucci <vtavarespetr@...ron.com>, Ravis OpenSrc <Ravis.OpenSrc@...ron.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" <horenc@...edu>, "Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" <horenchuang@...il.com>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@...edance.com>, sthanneeru@...ron.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] memory tier: acpi/hmat: create
CPUless memory tiers after obtaining HMAT info
I'm working on V3. Thanks for Ying's feedback.
cc: sthanneeru@...ron.com
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:54 AM Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> "Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" <horenchuang@...edance.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 2:21 AM Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> "Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" <horenchuang@...edance.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > The current implementation treats emulated memory devices, such as
> >> > CXL1.1 type3 memory, as normal DRAM when they are emulated as normal memory
> >> > (E820_TYPE_RAM). However, these emulated devices have different
> >> > characteristics than traditional DRAM, making it important to
> >> > distinguish them. Thus, we modify the tiered memory initialization process
> >> > to introduce a delay specifically for CPUless NUMA nodes. This delay
> >> > ensures that the memory tier initialization for these nodes is deferred
> >> > until HMAT information is obtained during the boot process. Finally,
> >> > demotion tables are recalculated at the end.
> >> >
> >> > * Abstract common functions into `find_alloc_memory_type()`
> >>
> >> We should move kmem_put_memory_types() (renamed to
> >> mt_put_memory_types()?) too. This can be put in a separate patch.
> >>
> >
> > Will do! Thanks,
> >
> >
> >>
> >> > Since different memory devices require finding or allocating a memory type,
> >> > these common steps are abstracted into a single function,
> >> > `find_alloc_memory_type()`, enhancing code scalability and conciseness.
> >> >
> >> > * Handle cases where there is no HMAT when creating memory tiers
> >> > There is a scenario where a CPUless node does not provide HMAT information.
> >> > If no HMAT is specified, it falls back to using the default DRAM tier.
> >> >
> >> > * Change adist calculation code to use another new lock, mt_perf_lock.
> >> > In the current implementation, iterating through CPUlist nodes requires
> >> > holding the `memory_tier_lock`. However, `mt_calc_adistance()` will end up
> >> > trying to acquire the same lock, leading to a potential deadlock.
> >> > Therefore, we propose introducing a standalone `mt_perf_lock` to protect
> >> > `default_dram_perf`. This approach not only avoids deadlock but also
> >> > prevents holding a large lock simultaneously.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horenchuang@...edance.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@...edance.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 11 ++++++
> >> > drivers/dax/kmem.c | 13 +------
> >> > include/linux/acpi.h | 6 ++++
> >> > include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 8 +++++
> >> > mm/memory-tiers.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >> > 5 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> >> > index d6b85f0f6082..28812ec2c793 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> >> > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ static LIST_HEAD(targets);
> >> > static LIST_HEAD(initiators);
> >> > static LIST_HEAD(localities);
> >> >
> >> > +static LIST_HEAD(hmat_memory_types);
> >> > +
> >>
> >> HMAT isn't a device driver for some memory devices. So I don't think we
> >> should manage memory types in HMAT.
> >
> > I can put it back in memory-tier.c. How about the list? Do we still
> > need to keep a separate list for storing late_inited memory nodes?
> > And how about the list name if we need to remove the prefix "hmat_"?
>
> I don't think we need a separate list for memory-less nodes. Just
> iterate all memory-less nodes.
>
Ok. There is no need to keep a list of memory-less nodes. I will
only keep a memory_type list to manage created memory types.
> >
> >> Instead, if the memory_type of a
> >> node isn't set by the driver, we should manage it in memory-tier.c as
> >> fallback.
> >>
> >
> > Do you mean some device drivers may init memory tiers between
> > memory_tier_init() and late_initcall(memory_tier_late_init);?
> > And this is the reason why you mention to exclude
> > "node_memory_types[nid].memtype != NULL" in memory_tier_late_init().
> > Is my understanding correct?
>
> Yes.
>
Thanks.
> >> > static DEFINE_MUTEX(target_lock);
> >> >
> >> > /*
> >> > @@ -149,6 +151,12 @@ int acpi_get_genport_coordinates(u32 uid,
> >> > }
> >> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(acpi_get_genport_coordinates, CXL);
> >> >
> >> > +struct memory_dev_type *hmat_find_alloc_memory_type(int adist)
> >> > +{
> >> > + return find_alloc_memory_type(adist, &hmat_memory_types);
> >> > +}
> >> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hmat_find_alloc_memory_type);
> >> > +
> >> > static __init void alloc_memory_initiator(unsigned int cpu_pxm)
> >> > {
> >> > struct memory_initiator *initiator;
> >> > @@ -1038,6 +1046,9 @@ static __init int hmat_init(void)
> >> > if (!hmat_set_default_dram_perf())
> >> > register_mt_adistance_algorithm(&hmat_adist_nb);
> >> >
> >> > + /* Post-create CPUless memory tiers after getting HMAT info */
> >> > + memory_tier_late_init();
> >> > +
> >>
> >> This should be called in memory-tier.c via
> >>
> >> late_initcall(memory_tier_late_init);
> >>
> >> Then, we don't need hmat to call it.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks. Learned!
> >
> >
> >> > return 0;
> >> > out_put:
> >> > hmat_free_structures();
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/dax/kmem.c b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> >> > index 42ee360cf4e3..aee17ab59f4f 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> >> > @@ -55,21 +55,10 @@ static LIST_HEAD(kmem_memory_types);
> >> >
> >> > static struct memory_dev_type *kmem_find_alloc_memory_type(int adist)
> >> > {
> >> > - bool found = false;
> >> > struct memory_dev_type *mtype;
> >> >
> >> > mutex_lock(&kmem_memory_type_lock);
> >> > - list_for_each_entry(mtype, &kmem_memory_types, list) {
> >> > - if (mtype->adistance == adist) {
> >> > - found = true;
> >> > - break;
> >> > - }
> >> > - }
> >> > - if (!found) {
> >> > - mtype = alloc_memory_type(adist);
> >> > - if (!IS_ERR(mtype))
> >> > - list_add(&mtype->list, &kmem_memory_types);
> >> > - }
> >> > + mtype = find_alloc_memory_type(adist, &kmem_memory_types);
> >> > mutex_unlock(&kmem_memory_type_lock);
> >> >
> >> > return mtype;
> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> >> > index b7165e52b3c6..3f927ff01f02 100644
> >> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> >> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> >> > @@ -434,12 +434,18 @@ int thermal_acpi_critical_trip_temp(struct acpi_device *adev, int *ret_temp);
> >> >
> >> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HMAT
> >> > int acpi_get_genport_coordinates(u32 uid, struct access_coordinate *coord);
> >> > +struct memory_dev_type *hmat_find_alloc_memory_type(int adist);
> >> > #else
> >> > static inline int acpi_get_genport_coordinates(u32 uid,
> >> > struct access_coordinate *coord)
> >> > {
> >> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >> > }
> >> > +
> >> > +static inline struct memory_dev_type *hmat_find_alloc_memory_type(int adist)
> >> > +{
> >> > + return NULL;
> >> > +}
> >> > #endif
> >> >
> >> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> >> > index 69e781900082..4bc2596c5774 100644
> >> > --- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> >> > +++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> >> > @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ int mt_calc_adistance(int node, int *adist);
> >> > int mt_set_default_dram_perf(int nid, struct access_coordinate *perf,
> >> > const char *source);
> >> > int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct access_coordinate *perf, int *adist);
> >> > +struct memory_dev_type *find_alloc_memory_type(int adist,
> >> > + struct list_head *memory_types);
> >> > +void memory_tier_late_init(void);
> >> > #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> >> > int next_demotion_node(int node);
> >> > void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets);
> >> > @@ -136,5 +139,10 @@ static inline int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct access_coordinate *perf, int *adis
> >> > {
> >> > return -EIO;
> >> > }
> >> > +
> >> > +static inline void memory_tier_late_init(void)
> >> > +{
> >> > +
> >> > +}
> >> > #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> >> > #endif /* _LINUX_MEMORY_TIERS_H */
> >> > diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> >> > index 0537664620e5..79f748d60e6f 100644
> >> > --- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
> >> > +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> >> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> >> > #include <linux/memory.h>
> >> > #include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
> >> > #include <linux/notifier.h>
> >> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> >> >
> >> > #include "internal.h"
> >> >
> >> > @@ -35,6 +36,7 @@ struct node_memory_type_map {
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > static DEFINE_MUTEX(memory_tier_lock);
> >> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(mt_perf_lock);
> >>
> >> Please add comments about what it protects. And put it near the data
> >> structure it protects.
> >>
> >
> > Where is better for me to add comments for this? Code? Patch description?
> > Will put it closer to the protected data. Thanks.
>
> Just put the comments at the above of the lock in the source code.
>
Got it. Thanks!
>
> >
> >
> >> > static LIST_HEAD(memory_tiers);
> >> > static struct node_memory_type_map node_memory_types[MAX_NUMNODES];
> >> > struct memory_dev_type *default_dram_type;
> >> > @@ -623,6 +625,58 @@ void clear_node_memory_type(int node, struct memory_dev_type *memtype)
> >> > }
> >> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clear_node_memory_type);
> >> >
> >> > +struct memory_dev_type *find_alloc_memory_type(int adist, struct list_head *memory_types)
> >> > +{
> >> > + bool found = false;
> >> > + struct memory_dev_type *mtype;
> >> > +
> >> > + list_for_each_entry(mtype, memory_types, list) {
> >> > + if (mtype->adistance == adist) {
> >> > + found = true;
> >> > + break;
> >> > + }
> >> > + }
> >> > + if (!found) {
> >> > + mtype = alloc_memory_type(adist);
> >> > + if (!IS_ERR(mtype))
> >> > + list_add(&mtype->list, memory_types);
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > + return mtype;
> >> > +}
> >> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(find_alloc_memory_type);
> >> > +
> >> > +static void memory_tier_late_create(int node)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct memory_dev_type *mtype = NULL;
> >> > + int adist = MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM;
> >> > +
> >> > + mt_calc_adistance(node, &adist);
> >> > + if (adist != MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM) {
> >>
> >> We can manage default_dram_type() via find_alloc_memory_type()
> >> too.
> >>
> >> And, if "node_memory_types[node].memtype == NULL", we can call
> >> mt_calc_adistance(node, &adist) and find_alloc_memory_type() in
> >> set_node_memory_tier(). Then, we can cover hotpluged memory node too.
> >>
> >> > + mtype = hmat_find_alloc_memory_type(adist);
> >> > + if (!IS_ERR(mtype))
> >> > + __init_node_memory_type(node, mtype);
> >> > + else
> >> > + pr_err("Failed to allocate a memory type at %s()\n", __func__);
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > + set_node_memory_tier(node);
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +void memory_tier_late_init(void)
> >> > +{
> >> > + int nid;
> >> > +
> >> > + mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
> >> > + for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY)
> >> > + if (!node_state(nid, N_CPU))
> >>
> >> We should exclude "node_memory_types[nid].memtype != NULL". Some memory
> >> nodes may be onlined by some device drivers and setup memory tiers
> >> already.
> >>
> >> > + memory_tier_late_create(nid);
> >> > +
> >> > + establish_demotion_targets();
> >> > + mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
> >> > +}
> >> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_tier_late_init);
> >> > +
> >> > static void dump_hmem_attrs(struct access_coordinate *coord, const char *prefix)
> >> > {
> >> > pr_info(
> >> > @@ -636,7 +690,7 @@ int mt_set_default_dram_perf(int nid, struct access_coordinate *perf,
> >> > {
> >> > int rc = 0;
> >> >
> >> > - mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
> >> > + mutex_lock(&mt_perf_lock);
> >> > if (default_dram_perf_error) {
> >> > rc = -EIO;
> >> > goto out;
> >> > @@ -684,7 +738,7 @@ int mt_set_default_dram_perf(int nid, struct access_coordinate *perf,
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > out:
> >> > - mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
> >> > + mutex_unlock(&mt_perf_lock);
> >> > return rc;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > @@ -700,7 +754,7 @@ int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct access_coordinate *perf, int *adist)
> >> > perf->read_bandwidth + perf->write_bandwidth == 0)
> >> > return -EINVAL;
> >> >
> >> > - mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
> >> > + mutex_lock(&mt_perf_lock);
> >> > /*
> >> > * The abstract distance of a memory node is in direct proportion to
> >> > * its memory latency (read + write) and inversely proportional to its
> >> > @@ -713,7 +767,7 @@ int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct access_coordinate *perf, int *adist)
> >> > (default_dram_perf.read_latency + default_dram_perf.write_latency) *
> >> > (default_dram_perf.read_bandwidth + default_dram_perf.write_bandwidth) /
> >> > (perf->read_bandwidth + perf->write_bandwidth);
> >> > - mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
> >> > + mutex_unlock(&mt_perf_lock);
> >> >
> >> > return 0;
> >> > }
> >> > @@ -836,6 +890,14 @@ static int __init memory_tier_init(void)
> >> > * types assigned.
> >> > */
> >> > for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY) {
> >> > + if (!node_state(node, N_CPU))
> >> > + /*
> >> > + * Defer memory tier initialization on CPUless numa nodes.
> >> > + * These will be initialized when HMAT information is
> >>
> >> HMAT is platform specific, we should avoid to mention it in general code
> >> if possible.
> >>
> >
> > Will fix! Thanks,
> >
> >
> >> > + * available.
> >> > + */
> >> > + continue;
> >> > +
> >> > memtier = set_node_memory_tier(node);
> >> > if (IS_ERR(memtier))
> >> > /*
> >>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
--
Best regards,
Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang
莊賀任
Powered by blists - more mailing lists