linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/22] Add i2c-mux and eeprom devices for Meta Yosemite 4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25d9939b599cdd40cd47027a86bca63f0acc271f.camel@codeconstruct.com.au>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:52:24 +1030
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
To: Delphine CC Chiu <Delphine_CC_Chiu@...ynn.com>, patrick@...cx.xyz
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,  linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/22] Add i2c-mux and eeprom devices for Meta
 Yosemite 4

Hello,

On Tue, 2024-03-12 at 14:15 +0800, Delphine CC Chiu wrote:
> Changelog:
>   - v6
>     - Revise i2c duty-cycle for meeting 400khz spec

A quick spot-check suggests that my comments on v5 haven't been
addressed. I didn't receive any replies to those comments either.

Can you please either discuss or implement the suggestions before
sending the series again?

Andrew

>   - v5
>     - Support medusa board adc sensors
>     - support NIC eeprom